HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
code-dot-org
JS-Interpreter
JavaScript2017–2017
code-dot-org / JS-Interpreter

JS-Interpreter

A sandboxed JavaScript interpreter in JavaScript.

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A sandboxed JavaScript interpreter in JavaScript.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-11-14 22:37:51 UTC to 2017-11-15 14:44:39 UTC.

0122017-11-14 22:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-14 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsNov 14, 22:002017-11-14 23:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-11-15 01:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 02:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 03:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 04:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 05:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 06:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsNov 15, 06:002017-11-15 07:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 08:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 09:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 10:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 11:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 12:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 13:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-15 14:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-15 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 15, 14:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 14, 22:002017-11-14 22:00:00 UTC2017-11-14 23:00:00 UTC202
Nov 14, 23:002017-11-14 23:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 00:002017-11-15 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 01:00:00 UTC101
Nov 15, 01:002017-11-15 01:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 02:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 02:002017-11-15 02:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 03:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 03:002017-11-15 03:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 04:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 04:002017-11-15 04:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 05:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 05:002017-11-15 05:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 06:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 06:002017-11-15 06:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 07:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 07:002017-11-15 07:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 08:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 08:002017-11-15 08:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 09:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 09:002017-11-15 09:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 10:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 10:002017-11-15 10:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 11:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 11:002017-11-15 11:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 12:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 12:002017-11-15 12:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 13:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 13:002017-11-15 13:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 14:00:00 UTC000
Nov 15, 14:002017-11-15 14:00:00 UTC2017-11-15 15:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
This is great advice, but needs a caveat. I'd say it this way: The less battle-tested a part of the stack is, the more likely it is to contain a bug. Suppose I'm using a database library written in Elixir to run a PostgreSQL query and I get a weird result. Where is the problem? PostgreSQL has executed billions of queries in thousands of projects for tens of years and has many contributors. The Elixir library is much newer and has many fewer contributors and has been used much less. My brand-new query has been executed a handful of times by me and has only been looked at by me. The chances are overwhelmingly high that the bug is in my code. If I can't find it there, the next candidate is the Elixir library. Only after exhaustive search in those two should I consider that PostgreSQL may have a bug. Or to include more of the stack: my co
Read the rest
de > Elixir lib > Elixir > Erlang > PostgreSQL The author's own anecdote with finding a bug in JavaScript's `sort()` illustrates this principle: it was not in (say) the Firefox or Chrome JS interpreter, but in a much less-used one: https://github.com/code-dot-org/JS-Interpreter/pull/23
In “It is never a compiler error”

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.