HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
coderwall
coderwall-legacy
Ruby2014–2014
coderwall / coderwall-legacy

coderwall-legacy

Professional network for software engineers

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
855GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Professional network for software engineers

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-07-09 23:08:31 UTC to 2014-11-06 19:54:09 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJul 72014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-08-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-08-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-08-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 12014-09-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-09-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-10-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-10-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-10-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-10-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-10-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-10-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-10-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-10-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-11-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-11-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-11-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 3

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 72014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC110
Jul 142014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 212014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 282014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 42014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 112014-08-11 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 182014-08-18 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 252014-08-25 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 12014-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 82014-09-08 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 152014-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 222014-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2014-09-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 292014-09-29 00:00:00 UTC2014-10-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 62014-10-06 00:00:00 UTC2014-10-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 132014-10-13 00:00:00 UTC2014-10-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 202014-10-20 00:00:00 UTC2014-10-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 272014-10-27 00:00:00 UTC2014-11-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 32014-11-03 00:00:00 UTC2014-11-10 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Building a viable business on top of an open source project is totally possible. But, like building lots of other types of businesses, it can be difficult. These challenges cut close to some things we are aiming to solve at Assembly [http://assembly.com]. One such question we hope to answer is this: "how can people build a real, profitable company in a collaborative, open manner like they build in an open source environment?" An example is Coderwall, which makes more than $25,000/month [1] and is built and maintained by the community. Each month, revenue goes to the people who are building the product. All the code is publicly available [2], and licensed to be used non-commercially. A core team of contributors guide vision and quality control, but anyone can participate. It's not exactly open source, but products on Assembly are built in
Read the rest
the open and anyone can dive in and help out. Some products have lofty ambitions to make big revenue, and others are are more aimed at being a public offering like a traditional open source project. [1] https://assembly.com/coderwall/posts/coderwall-coinholder-up... [2] https://github.com/assemblymade/coderwall
In Open Source and the Challenge of Making Money

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.