HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
cognibit
Text-Normalization-Demo
Jupyter Notebook2018–2018
cognibit / Text-Normalization-Demo

Text-Normalization-Demo

Demonstration of the results in "Text Normalization using Memory Augmented Neural Networks", Authors: Subhojeet Pramanik, Aman Hussain

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
60GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Demonstration of the results in "Text Normalization using Memory Augmented Neural Networks", Authors: Subhojeet Pramanik, Aman Hussain

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-06-12 08:03:07 UTC to 2018-06-12 09:34:52 UTC.

0122018-06-12 08:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-12 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 12, 08:002018-06-12 09:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-12 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsJun 12, 09:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 12, 08:002018-06-12 08:00:00 UTC2018-06-12 09:00:00 UTC101
Jun 12, 09:002018-06-12 09:00:00 UTC2018-06-12 10:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Their code is here: https://github.com/cognibit/Text-Normalization-Demo Official DeepMind DNC code is here: https://github.com/deepmind/dnc They use "an unmodified version of the architecture as specified in the original paper", and it looks like they copy & pasted the core code. This paper lacks some further explanation. Why do they use XGBoost for predicting whether some word is to be normalized? And why do they use DNC for the seq2seq model? I think a single shared model for both tasks might be a cleaner solution. E.g. an encoder which with output layer for the prediction and also this encoder is fed to the decoder. The motivation for DNC is also not too clear, although I can guess that they think this is too hard for a LSTM. But for DNC, to get the advantages out of it, it should support some time for doing internal calculations, whic
Read the rest
h you could get by introducing internal computation steps. They don't do that. Also, in their results section, they do not compare to any other model, so it it not clear whether XGBoost is the best choice, and also not whether the DNC really helps here.
In Text Normalization using Memory Augmented Neural Networks

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.