HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
collin
jabs
Ruby2009–2009
collin / jabs

jabs

Javascript Abstract Behavior Syntax

Web Development
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
73GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Javascript Abstract Behavior Syntax

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2009-11-30 16:15:19 UTC to 2009-12-05 19:36:42 UTC.

012009-11-30 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-11-30 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 30, 12:002009-11-30 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-01 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-01 06:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-01 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-01 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-03 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsDec 3, 00:002009-12-03 06:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-03 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-03 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-03 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-03 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-04 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-04 06:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-04 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-04 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-04 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-04 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-05 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-05 06:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-05 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-05 12:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-05 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2009-12-05 18:00:00 UTC to 2009-12-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 5, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 30, 12:002009-11-30 12:00:00 UTC2009-11-30 18:00:00 UTC110
Nov 30, 18:002009-11-30 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 1, 00:002009-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2009-12-01 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 1, 06:002009-12-01 06:00:00 UTC2009-12-01 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 1, 12:002009-12-01 12:00:00 UTC2009-12-01 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 1, 18:002009-12-01 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 2, 00:002009-12-02 00:00:00 UTC2009-12-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 2, 06:002009-12-02 06:00:00 UTC2009-12-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 2, 12:002009-12-02 12:00:00 UTC2009-12-02 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 2, 18:002009-12-02 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 3, 00:002009-12-03 00:00:00 UTC2009-12-03 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 3, 06:002009-12-03 06:00:00 UTC2009-12-03 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 3, 12:002009-12-03 12:00:00 UTC2009-12-03 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 3, 18:002009-12-03 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 4, 00:002009-12-04 00:00:00 UTC2009-12-04 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 4, 06:002009-12-04 06:00:00 UTC2009-12-04 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 4, 12:002009-12-04 12:00:00 UTC2009-12-04 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 4, 18:002009-12-04 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 5, 00:002009-12-05 00:00:00 UTC2009-12-05 06:00:00 UTC000
Dec 5, 06:002009-12-05 06:00:00 UTC2009-12-05 12:00:00 UTC000
Dec 5, 12:002009-12-05 12:00:00 UTC2009-12-05 18:00:00 UTC000
Dec 5, 18:002009-12-05 18:00:00 UTC2009-12-06 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
rincewind·Dec 5, 2009
> I understand this is fashionable in the CL world, but I've never seen any good justification for this practice outside of saying, "Now everything is in lisp." [...] > I understand that's nice and all, but couldn't you just write javascript? I agree with you on this point (JQuery is quite nice), but this is orthogonal to the CL vs. Clojure vs. $Framework debate. http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/Protot... http://clamato.net/ http://github.com/collin/jabs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-J
In Ask HN: Common Lisp vs Clojure for web apps?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.