HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
colmmacc
s2n
C2020–2020
colmmacc / s2n

s2n

s2n : an implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
5GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

s2n : an implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-10-05 01:34:16 UTC to 2020-10-05 06:37:37 UTC.

012020-10-05 01:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 5, 01:002020-10-05 02:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-10-05 03:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 5, 03:002020-10-05 04:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-10-05 05:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-10-05 06:00:00 UTC to 2020-10-05 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 5, 06:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 5, 01:002020-10-05 01:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 02:00:00 UTC101
Oct 5, 02:002020-10-05 02:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 03:00:00 UTC000
Oct 5, 03:002020-10-05 03:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 04:00:00 UTC000
Oct 5, 04:002020-10-05 04:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 05:00:00 UTC000
Oct 5, 05:002020-10-05 05:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 06:00:00 UTC000
Oct 5, 06:002020-10-05 06:00:00 UTC2020-10-05 07:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
For Question 1, you can turn division by a known constant into multiplications + bitshifts using a library like `libdivide`[1]. Then, we could use the regular rejection sampling algorithm mentioned in the annotated code [2]. I'd be curious how the naive rejection sampling algorithm's performance compares to Lemire's algorithm's when both are updated to use libdivide... [1] https://libdivide.com/ [2] https://github.com/colmmacc/s2n/blob/7ad9240c8b9ade0cc3a403a...
In Dissecting Lemire's nearly divisionless random number generator

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.