HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
compiling-to-categories
concat
Haskell2018–2021
compiling-to-categories / concat

concat

Compiling to Categories

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
463GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Compiling to Categories

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-10-27 17:36:21 UTC to 2021-12-30 08:32:35 UTC.

012018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
The problem with this is this is that it assumes the programming language is the last world in the developer experience. I am certainly a language person, and you cannot get anywhere with a bad language, but merely having a good language is not enough. Working on github.com/obsidiansystems/obelisk/ we have very very many things we would like to work on, but not super much of it involves "adding new features" to Haskell. And yet the libraries are so richly layered e.g. the frontend feels more different from regular effectful code in Haskell, than regular effectful code in Haskell feels different from that in other languages. The one feature we would like in Haskell is arguably a "removing the weaknesses and restrictions that make additional features appear necessary" thing, which is something like https://github.com/conal/concat and https:
Read the rest
//arxiv.org/abs/1007.2885. This would be a way to make some categorical DSL stuff less annoying to write because you have to make it point-free.
In Features of a dream programming language

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.