HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
cucumber
common
OPEN SOURCE2011–2015
cucumber / common

common

A home for issues that are common to multiple cucumber repositories

5Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A home for issues that are common to multiple cucumber repositories

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:03:30 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-06-17 18:16:48 UTC to 2015-08-17 06:45:17 UTC.

01232011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20112012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments2015

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321

What Hacker News says

3 sources
everdev·Jun 18, 2015Submission

Ask HN: Better way to write specs?

Is there a standard way of writing BDD specs in a rule-based format? To me, the traditional Gherkin-style format is too verbose and depends on defining edge-cases in lengthy scenarios. I'm looking for something that more defines the business logic in English and covers the edge cases in the test code. Like: Feature: Serve coffee Rule: If there is no coffee left, refund the money Otherwise: Rule: Coffee should not be served until paid for and until the button has been pressed Rule: If the customer is on the VIP list, don't charge any money Instead of: Feature: Serve coffee Coffee should not be served until paid for Coffee should not be served until the button has been pressed If there is no coffee left then money should be refunded Scenario: Buy last coffee Given there are 1 coffees left in the m
Read the rest
achine And I have deposited 1$ When I press the coffee button Then I should be served a coffee Scenario: VIP buys coffee Given there are 1 coffees left in the machine And I have deposited 1$ And I am on the VIP guest list When I press the coffee button Then I should be served a coffee Then my money should be returned .. scenario for VIP trying to buy coffee, but no coffee left .. scenario for regular user trying to buy coffee, but no coffee left, etc. (example from: https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Feature-Introduction)
4 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.