HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
cue-labs
cue-by-example
CUE2024–2025
cue-labs / cue-by-example

cue-by-example

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
81GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-11-27 08:40:58 UTC to 2025-05-06 18:54:13 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012024-11-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 252024-12-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 102025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 5

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Nov 252024-11-25 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-02 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 22024-12-02 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 92024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 162024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 232024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 302024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 62025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 132025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 202025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 272025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 32025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 102025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 172025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 32025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 102025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 172025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 242025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 312025-03-31 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 72025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 142025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 212025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 282025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC000
May 52025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
if you only work with your own stuff, helm is easily (and best) avoided. i like generating k8s yaml with cue, example: https://github.com/cue-labs/cue-by-example/tree/main/003_kub... there's also https://timoni.sh/ if you want a helm-like experience, but with cue instead of templating. If you're working with upstream projects, unfortunately many of them will only provide helm charts, so you got to decide between rewriting them to suit your env/tool, or just live with the crappiness of helm.
In Getting tired of Helm – any better way to handle deployments in Kubernetes?
If you have 200 YAML files for a single service and 46 clusters I think you're using k8s wrong. And 5 + 3 different monitoring and logging tools could be a symptom of chaos in the organization. k8s, and the go runtime and network stack have been heavily optimized by armies of engineers at Google and big tech, so I am very suspicious of these claims without evidence. Show me the resource usage from k8s component overhead, and the 15 minute to 3 minute deploys and then I'll believe you. And the 200 file YAML or Helm charts so I can understand why in gods name you're doing it that way. This post just needs a lot more details. What are the typical services/workloads running on k8s? What's the end user application? I taught myself k8s in the first month of my first job, and it felt like having super powers. The core concepts are very beautiful
Read the rest
, like processes on Linux or JSON APIs over HTTP. And its not too hard to build a CustomResourceDefinition or dive into the various high performance disk and network IO components if you need to. I do hate Helm to some degree but there are alternatives like Kustomize, Jsonnet/Tanka, or Cue https://github.com/cue-labs/cue-by-example/tree/main/003_kub.... You can even manage k8s resources via Terraform or Pulumi
In I Stopped Using Kubernetes. Our DevOps Team Is Happier Than Ever

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.