secretless-broker

Secure your apps by making them Secretless

Explore on GitHub Read Hacker News discussions

2Distinct people

2Mentions

0Explicit recommenders

398GitHub stars

REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Secure your apps by making them Secretless

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-01-24 15:25:52 UTC to 2026-04-25 22:40:50 UTC.

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges

UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
Period	Start (UTC)	End (exclusive, UTC)	Mentions	Comments
2020	2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	1	1
2021	2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0
2022	2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0
2023	2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0
2024	2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0
2025	2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0
2026 (partial)	2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	1	1

What Hacker News says

2 sources

subhobroto·Apr 25, 2026

Please let me know how I can help. Can I write or review the initial forum post for you or anything that can help both of us? - What's the best way to discuss this specific topic with you? As an https://github.com/spinningfactory/kloak/issues or something else? - My specific usecase is to not need Conjur Secretless Broker (https://github.com/cyberark/secretless-broker) - my understanding of eBPF is entirely superficial but from a 30k ft view, it looks like this can not only replace it but would be a far efficient solution (Conjur would be a user-space proxy while kloak would be at lower levels of abstraction)?

In Show HN: Kloak, A secret manager that keeps K8s workload away from secrets

sgnnseven·Jan 24, 2020

(shameless plug as well) Try out CyberArk DAP (formerly Conjur): https://hub.docker.com/r/cyberark/conjur. OSS, powerful RBAC, has k8s-native workload ident auth, works on OCP and w/ PCF, lots of tooling integrations (https://github.com/cyberark/summon, https://github.com/cyberark/secretless-broker, etc), and there's a relatively straightforward path up to "enterprise"-y stuff if you think you want the bells and whistles (replication, auto-deployable followers, multi-zone failover, etc).

In Google Cloud’s Secrets Manager