HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
darshandsoni
asciidoctor-skins
CSS2016–2021
darshandsoni / asciidoctor-skins

asciidoctor-skins

Control how your asciidoctor powered documentation looks

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
314GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Control how your asciidoctor powered documentation looks

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-08-03 06:09:16 UTC to 2021-04-28 03:32:02 UTC.

012016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

4 sources
I recently switched from Markdown to AsciiDoc. It is much better in my opinion. The syntax is similar enough to MD that just having the adoc cheatsheet bookmarked is enough to switch. But it's more structured, much more fully featured, just two big implementations (AsciiDoc and AsciiDoctor) which are largely compatible. There's only one way to mark the language of a code block, only one way to make lists, only one way to make footnotes, etc. Also it actually has first-class support for things like footnotes and admonitions[0] etc. It is a syntactic sugar layer on the DocBook XML format which is apparently used to make actual books. But AsciiDoctor compiles it to everything from DocBook XML to HTML to Markdown to ePub to PDF. Another thing I like is that AsciiDoctor actually comes with a good default stylesheet. If you just turn MD into HT
Read the rest
ML you get ugly garbage and need to figure out how to put CSS into the HTML etc. AsciiDoctor has a good default theme as well as a number of other themes available[1], and by default will embed the CSS into the HTML so you just have one file to distribute. It even shows anchor links to the headings when you hover over them. [0]: https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-writers-guide/#admonit... [1]: this made it easier for me to add the themes, and includes more beyond the ones bundled with adoc: https://github.com/darshandsoni/asciidoctor-skins
In mdBook – A utility to create modern online books from Markdown files
Eh, I'd say they're pretty different goals and use cases in reality. Pandoc is great for translation into other formats, where the other format then is applied final styling using downstream tools. AsciiDoctor is for the Asciidoc format, but, generally includes some nice tooling for commonly used output formats. Yes, you can use pandoc to convert asciidoc to something else, but in general, I've noticed that asciidoctor has great support for HTML themes: https://asciidoctor.org/docs/produce-custom-themes-using-asc... https://github.com/darshandsoni/asciidoctor-skins The PDF styling directly out of the asciidoctor tool, on the other hand, isn't as advanced. So going from asciidoc to DocBook can make sense here, and I think is probably still done to do things like create truly professional looking PDFs. What to use? Depends on your toolchain
Read the rest
. I almost never need anything but HTML and PDF. I've found that people, used to Markdown, can jump into Asciidoc and use `asciidoctor` easily.
In Asciidoctor – A fast, open-source text processor and publishing toolchain

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.