HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
DEAP
deap
Python2016–2019
DEAP / deap

deap

Distributed Evolutionary Algorithms in Python

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Distributed Evolutionary Algorithms in Python

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-01-11 16:14:21 UTC to 2019-07-06 20:17:08 UTC.

0122016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
deapjvm·Jan 11, 2016Submission

Ask HN: Java vs. Scala for JVM based computational intelligence library

I am creating a JVM based library for computational intelligence algorithms, similar to https://github.com/deap/deap (python). One of my primary goals with the library is commercial usability and therefore performance, as such I will be relying on Skymind's ND4J/S linear algebra library quite heavily (if you have any experience with alternatives, I am keen on hearing about them). My question is, should I create the library in Java (8) or Scala? - Using Java allows compatibility with most other JVM languages and frameworks (including Scala) if limited to Java 7. - I prefer Scala over Java, as Scala is a more powerful language that will allow me to do more (especially functionally), but primarily I am worried that it will exclude users and/or contributors. - I plan on integrating with Skymind's DL4J neural networks, though I think both lang
Read the rest
uages will allow that. - Apache Spark integration is also a goal. - I am somewhat worried about the longevity of Scala. - I am proficient in both languages, in both OO and functional styles. Any feedback is much appreciated!
1 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.