HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
denoland
deno
Rust2018–2026
denoland / deno

deno

A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.

161Distinct people
202Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
108.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.

GitHub

Where it is used

  • Netlify — Netlify used Deno Subhosting to build and ship its edge functions product within weeks, choosing it over building their own solution on AWS Lambda. Source

What people are saying

I love Deno and I use this, but I really wish they would fix this dumb bug: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/16466

IshKebab used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:01:12 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year202 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-08-23 15:35:35 UTC to 2026-10-16 06:53:01 UTC.

010203040502018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 16 mentions; 4 submissions, 12 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 1 submissions, 7 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 45 mentions; 18 submissions, 27 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 30 mentions; 4 submissions, 26 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 33 mentions; 4 submissions, 29 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 30 mentions; 1 submissions, 29 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 1 submissions, 8 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 18 mentions; 0 submissions, 18 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 1 submissions, 12 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC16412
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC817
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC451827
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC30426
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC33429
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC30129
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC918
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC18018
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC13112

What Hacker News says

45 sources
Due respect, these are issues with how the Deno team uses Typescript, not with the language itself. > TypeScript compile time when changing files takes several minutes, making continuous compiling an excruciatingly slow process Umm, you can compile single files, and serve them individually. It's no different from bundling (e.g. with webpack) Javascript. > The Typescript structure that they’re using in the source files that create the actual Deno executable and the user-facing APIs is creating runtime performance problems Then use a better structure? ? TypeScript isn’t proving itself helpful to organize Deno code. On the contrary, the Deno team is experiencing the opposite effect. One of the issues mentioned is that they ended up with duplicate independent Body classes in two locations https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/4748 Then cons
Read the rest
olidate the two classes...? How is the the language's fault? > The internal code and runtime TypeScript declarations must be manually kept in sync since the TypeScript Compiler isn’t helpful to generate the d.ts files Well, it can be. Fix your build rules. > They’re maintaining two TS compiler hosts: one for the internal Deno code and another other for external user code even though both have a similar goal Again, not the language's fault. --- We've been using Typescript for a couple of years now, and it's been great. By trying to do things the right way, it actually forces us to organize our code better. I think the Deno project would benefit from refactoring their code to solve their issues, instead of blaming the tools.
In Deno will stop using TypeScript
According to its architecture description ¹, there are no containers or virtualization involved in Deno. I found deno::CoreIsolate in the source ². Userland process isolation seem to be provided by V8 Isolate. The execution and security model remind me of recent trend in FaaS, in particular running WebWorkers (or similar), WASM, etc. Found a fascinating presentation about how V8 is used at CloudFlare ³. "..using V8 isolates instead of containers or VMs, achieving 10x-100x faster cold starts and lower memory footprints.." --- ¹ https://deno.land/manual/contributing/architecture#schematic... ² https://github.com/denoland/deno/blob/2610ceac20bc644c0b58bd... ³ Fine-Grained Sandboxing with V8 Isolates - https://www.infoq.com/presentations/cloudflare-v8/
In Deno Is a Browser for Code

Showing the 15 most recent of 45 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.