HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
diggerhq
digger
Go2023–2024
diggerhq / digger

digger

Digger is an open source IaC orchestration tool. Digger allows you to run IaC in your existing CI pipeline ⚡️

5Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
5.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Digger is an open source IaC orchestration tool. Digger allows you to run IaC in your existing CI pipeline ⚡️

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:45:45 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-03-21 19:41:28 UTC to 2024-06-24 16:53:01 UTC.

0122023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsMar 20232023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 20232023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 20232023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC211
Apr 20232023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20232023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jun 20232023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC220
Jul 20232023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC211
Aug 20232023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Sep 20232023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20232023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20232023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20232023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20242024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 20242024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20242024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC110
May 20242024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20242024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

1 sources
iacguy·Jun 24, 2024Submission

Ask HN: How do we price the enterprise edition of our open source product?

Pricing an open source project is tricky. Especially so because the traditional COSS strategy of the last 10 years used by the likes of Mongo DB, Hashicorp and others, has received flak for the “BUSL rug-pull”. It is our firm belief that Digger will continue to be Open Source, and we have built the product around gitlab’s buyer based open core model [1] from day 1. The enterprise edition features around collaboration and governance would be what people would pay for, with the features around automation being free. This however, presents somewhat of a chicken-egg challenge in the early stages. Being a super small team, while the community edition brings us user love, the features in the enterprise edition brings us revenue, and for sustainable continuance of the product for both CE and EE features, we need to prioritise the requests and fe
Read the rest
atures of users that are willing to pay. We have slowly started figuring out the features that people would pay for and we are working hard to onboard our enterprise customers. But a question we repeatedly get asked is: how are you thinking about pricing? Why is it not transparent? The simple answer is that we are still figuring it out. The complex answer, is detailed in our current thesis below: We think that where Digger wins amongst its existing user base is that most “middle tier” features amongst competitors can be used for free either via self hosting the community edition or via using the free automation tier. Digger’s collaboration tier also presents a significant advantage vs competition in that it doesn’t charge “self hosting” tax, and allows users to self host the features available in the collaboration tier at no additional cost. Now coming to the governance tier, Digger allows users to consume the features in this tier via their preferred means, and also has a bunch of governance features such as SSO, Audit trails, log forwarding and private VCS support which are often hard enterprise requirements. We’d love the community’s feedback on this. Both regarding the feature split and on the actual pricing. We've also created a github issue regarding this: https://github.com/diggerhq/digger/issues/1589 [1]: https://handbook.opencoreventures.com/open-core-business-model/#764604b5c6db4107bb…
1 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.