HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
distillpub
post--momentum
JavaScript2017–2025
distillpub / post--momentum

post--momentum

Why Momentum Really Works

3Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
211GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Why Momentum Really Works

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-04-04 20:09:36 UTC to 2025-04-29 14:31:28 UTC.

0122017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
A few comments on this thread: Gwern is correct in his prior quote of how long these articles took. I think 50-200 hours is a pretty good range. I expect AI assistants could help quite a bit with implementing the interactive diagrams, which was a significant fraction of this time. This is especially true for authors without a background in web development. However, a huge amount of the editorial time went into other things. This article was a best case scenario for an article not written by the editors themselves. Gabriel is phenomenal and was a delight to work with. The editors didn't write any code for this article that I remember. But we still spent many tens of hours giving feedback on the text and diagrams. You can see some of this in github - e.g. https://github.com/distillpub/post--momentum/issues?q=is%3Ai... More broadly, we strug
Read the rest
gled a lot with procedural issues. (We wrote a bit about this here: https://distill.pub/2021/distill-hiatus/ ) In retrospect, I deeply regret trying to run Distill with the expectations of a scientific journal, rather than the freedom of a blog, or wish I'd pushed back more on process. Not only did it occupy enormous amounts of time and energy, but it was just very de-energizing. I wanted to spend my time writing great articles and helping people great articles. (I was recently reading Thompson & Klein's Abundance, and kept thinking back to my experiences with Distill.)
In Why Momentum Works (2017)
There are a few things that need to come together for a complete diagram publishing system: * Converting hand-drawn sketches to tidy diagrams [1] * Converting tidy diagrams to look hand-drawn [2] * A textual DSL for diagrams (e.g. Penrose) * Support of declarative constraints for the diagram [3] * Animation of the diagram [4][5] [1] Paper https://www.fiftythree.com/think [2] rough.js https://github.com/pshihn/rough [3] Basalt https://www.anishathalye.com/2019/12/12/constraint-based-gra... [4] Distill https://distill.pub/2017/momentum/ source https://github.com/distillpub/post--momentum [65] g9.js https://omrelli.ug/g9/
In CMU’s ‘Penrose’ Turns Complex Math Notations into Illustrative Diagrams

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.