HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
dotnet
corefx
Languages & Compilers2014–2023
dotnet / corefx · Archived

corefx

This repo is used for servicing PR's for .NET Core 2.1 and 3.1. Please visit us at https://github.com/dotnet/runtime

69Distinct people
78Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
17.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

This repo is used for servicing PR's for .NET Core 2.1 and 3.1. Please visit us at https://github.com/dotnet/runtime

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:56:55 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year78 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-11-12 15:47:17 UTC to 2023-02-10 12:20:05 UTC.

0510152014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 5 submissions, 12 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 15 mentions; 4 submissions, 11 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 4 submissions, 4 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 1 submissions, 8 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 16 mentions; 0 submissions, 16 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17512
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC15411
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC844
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC918
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC16016
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Going forward, the .NET team is using https://github.com/dotnet/runtime to develop the code and issues formerly in this repository. Please see the following for more context: dotnet/announcements#119 "Consolidating .NET GitHub repos"
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

15 sources
Exciting to see the rc released. I've been waiting up until this point to really dive into a project. One of the things that will be a huge barrier for me though is the lack of system.drawing. I've worked in the sign and graphics industry for 8 years and a lot of software I have written relies on system.drawing. The font rendering is crucial. It appears the only feasible option is the mono implementation.(and maybe that is good enough) Looking ahead I'm curious if there will ever be aa coreclr replacement for this? It seems Microsoft closed the open issue regarding this. https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/2020#event-360344181
In Announcing .NET Core and ASP.NET 5 RC
With OCaml, that depends what you mean by concurrency. There's good async IO, but the runtime is still single threaded (just like Node!). The overall library ecosystem is a disappointing though. https://github.com/janestreet/async And it is a huge shame F# doesn't work well cross platform. Hopefully we'll see the runtime ported soon. Looks like it builds, but the tests are probably a mess: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx Haskell, yeah, very much agreed. Hopefully one day a big company will build us a modern language with a vibrant ecosystem. Microsoft has come the closest with F#. Rust is tentatively exciting, but who knows if Mozilla has the muscle to get it adopted.
In Warming up to Go
.NET team member here ... We like to think of .NET Native as a native tool-chain for .NET Core. I say "a" because the Xamarin and Unity (IL2CPP) tool-chains are equally applicable (and we've talked to them about it). The core framework libraries (CoreFX) - https://github.com/dotnet/corefx - are used for all .NET Core scenarios, including .NET Native (UWP). This means that your code does the same thing in all of these different environments, since it's using the same underlying framework libraries. Separately, the Mono project is taking a lot of the same code, which means that the base framework for Xamarin apps are becoming more compatible with CoreFX, too. Yeahh! We hope to make this more formal in the future. We talk to @migueldeicaza about this frequently. Today, .NET Native and .NET Core use two different runtimes, MRT and CoreCLR, re
Read the rest
spectively. MRT expands to the extremely creative "managed runtime". Colloquially, we call it "Mr. T". Earlier in the project, everyone working on .NET Native had posters of Mr. T (yes, that one) on our doors. Mohawks were entirely optional on the parts of team members. MRT was built for static ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation. It is the child of the Redhawk project (http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-codename-redhawk-live...). Redhawk was built to be a .NET-esque (using C# + extensions) systems programming environment. MRT was built to have many of the same benefits, but be compatible with .NET (not just "esque") and support nothing less, nothing more than C#. CoreCLR is a child of the .NET Framework CLR. CLR (and by extention, CoreCLR) was built for dynamic execution, with a JIT. It supports AOT compilation in the pre-jit/NGEN sense. The GC is the primary shared component between the two (MRT, CLR/CoreCLR) runtimes. We plan to bring static compilation to more scenarios, however, we strongly believe that both JIT and (real) AOT are legitimate and compelling technologies and experiences and both are on our long-term roadmap. We'd like to leave the compilation choice/appraoch up to our users/customers. Novel idea, eh? We have a lot of fun runtime and compiler tech on the team. It's a fun place to work. Much of it is now open source, meaning that we get to work on this fun tech in the open. This is our latest compiler announcement: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/07/20/announcing....
In .NET Native Performance
FSharp was one of the first open source microsoft projects year ago about license: https://github.com/Microsoft/visualfsharp/blob/master/Licens... -> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 the open source repo https://github.com/fsharp/fsharp is open source AND accept pull request, the development is done on github, very friendly the .NET too is going opensource, see https://github.com/dotnet/corefx (.NET base class libraries) and https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr (.NET virtual machine) and https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn (C#/VB compiler)
In Proving Things About Biology with F#

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.