HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
dotnet
corefxlab
C#2015–2020
dotnet / corefxlab · Archived

corefxlab

This repo is for experimentation and exploring new ideas that may or may not make it into the main corefx repo.

17Distinct people
20Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

This repo is for experimentation and exploring new ideas that may or may not make it into the main corefx repo.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year20 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-04-29 21:22:19 UTC to 2020-04-14 17:28:25 UTC.

024682015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 4 submissions, 4 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC844
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Hello, this repository is now archived. Going forward, the .NET team is using https://github.com/dotnet/machinelearning for Microsoft.Data.* and https://github.com/dotnet/runtimelab for experiments.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

20 sources
It is a path to enlightenment with multiple stops. :) Start with Joe Duffy blog posts about Midori architecture. http://joeduffyblog.com/2015/11/03/blogging-about-midori/ Then hop on to his talks. "Safe Systems Programming in C# and .NET" https://www.infoq.com/presentations/csharp-systems-programmi... "RustConf 2017 - Closing Keynote: Safe Systems Software and the Future of Computing by Joe Duffy" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVm938gMWl0 Then you can watch "Inside .NET Native" from Channel 9 https://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Inside-NET-Native Finally there are the specs and related discussions that lead up to C# 7.3 design. https://github.com/dotnet/corefxlab/tree/master/docs/specs The TL;DR; version, basically async/await, the UWP AOT compiler, improved handling of value types, spans (aka slices), improved GC (TryStartNoGCReg
Read the rest
ion()) have their roots in System C# used in Midori. Also there are some influences of Singularity, namely Bartok and MDIL, on the WP 8.x AOT compiler, but that is not longer relevant.
In Rust RAII is better than the Haskell bracket pattern
It means that development on Kestrel started before work on making System.Net.Sockets cross-platform was completed. The programming model for libuv and .NET Sockets is different enough (mostly in terms of threading) to make the transition non-trivial. Some recent basic testing show .NET Sockets perform at least as well as libuv. We are strongly considering transitioning Kestrel to Sockets at the same time we migrate from Streams to Pipelines. [1] Pipelines are basically push based Streams that require less total allocations to use. This is because Pipelines allow better memory sharing between producers and consumers. [1] https://github.com/dotnet/corefxlab/tree/master/src/System.I... Disclosure: In case it wasn't already obvious, I work for Microsoft on Kestrel.
In Announcing .NET Core 1.1

Showing the 15 most recent of 20 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.