HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
dotnet
standard
OPEN SOURCE2016–2017
dotnet / standard · Archived

standard

This repo is building the .NET Standard

10Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

This repo is building the .NET Standard

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 12:45:45 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-09-26 17:58:28 UTC to 2017-12-24 19:38:12 UTC.

012342016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 commentsSep 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 20162016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Oct 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 20172017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20172017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 20172017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Sep 20172017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20172017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20172017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
If you look at this file, you should find the definitions for WebRequest and subclasses. It looks like the synchronous overloads you are looking for are there, but I'm not sure exactly which ones you want. Regardless, they should be there and if they aren't, it's most likely an accidental omission. https://github.com/dotnet/standard/blob/master/netstandard/r... I think that GitHub is either having trouble with how large some of these files are, or just hasn't indexed them yet, since they aren't showing up in the repo search.
In Introducing .NET Standard
Small correction: .NET Core _will_ implement it. It has to grow quite a bit to get there. At least, that's my reading, but they manage to be fairly confusing by mixing present tense and future tense with two different names: "- .NET Standard is a set of APIs that all .NET platforms have to implement. This unifies the .NET platforms and prevents future fragmentation. - .NET Standard 2.0 will be implemented by .NET Framework, .NET Core, and Xamarin. For .NET Core, this will add many of the existing APIs that have been requested. - .NET Standard 2.0 includes a compatibility shim for .NET Framework binaries, significantly increasing the set of libraries that you can reference from your .NET Standard libraries. - .NET Standard will replace Portable Class Libraries (PCLs) as the tooling story for building multi-platform .NET libraries." So, do
Read the rest
we have ".NET Standard" now and ".NET Standard 2.0" in the future? If so, why don't they say ".NET Standard 2.0 will include a compatibility shim for .NET Framework binaries"? On the other hand https://github.com/dotnet/standard/blob/master/netstandard/p... seems to indicate the two are synonyms, and version 2.0 is the first version of this framework.
In Introducing .NET Standard
> What I want to know is, will the sync (not async/await) methods be available on Linux on .NET Core? Yes, they most likely will be. If you search through the reference assembly interfaces listed here, you should be able to tell whether the functionality you want will be available. https://github.com/dotnet/standard/tree/master/netstandard/r... For things like legacy synchronous or Begin/End async methods, we are more or less adding them wholesale to the standard. If something like that is still missing, then it's most likely an accidental omission rather than a conscious removal. (I work on .NET at Microsoft).
In Introducing .NET Standard
Seems pretty simple to me. * Almost every .NET API will be in the standard library and thus will be cross-platform * Terrible APIs that they should have never created will be available as packages * Stuff that's platform-specific runs only on those platforms * Every API is listed in this repo: https://github.com/dotnet/standard I got that from reading the TL;DR and skimming the rest of the post
In Introducing .NET Standard

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.