HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
DotNetAnalyzers
StyleCopAnalyzers
C#2015–2025
DotNetAnalyzers / StyleCopAnalyzers

StyleCopAnalyzers

An implementation of StyleCop rules using the .NET Compiler Platform

3Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

An implementation of StyleCop rules using the .NET Compiler Platform

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-05-30 12:27:25 UTC to 2025-07-30 15:58:31 UTC.

0122015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Here’s more about commenting style: https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers/blob/ma... StyleCop is used for analyzing code style in C# code. Specifically: > If the comment is being used to comment out a line of code, begin the comment with four forward slashes rather than two. StyleCop relies on this to tell the difference between commented code and code comments. If you use ReSharper, it can do some nifty transformation to strike these out in the IDE which is kinda cool too. I’m a big fan of StyleCop to enforce consistent code styles. (Even if it’s not always what I may aesthetically prefer.)
In Why is it so hard to see code from 5 minutes ago?
cakes·May 30, 2015Submission

Ask HN: How can project transitions be properly communicated?

As a user/consumer of (various) open source projects - I can accept that they change/die/merge/etc over time. A lot of time it is volunteer time and priorities changes. With that in mind...how can you properly communicate a transition from a current project to another? StyleCop would be a helpful example here. The current version appears (or at least seems to be) dead and/or dying [1]. It has been cloned to github [2] (from codeplex) but nobody is making an effort. I would be willing _but_ after further research I found out that in fact it is sort of rising as a re-implementation with all the Microsoft open sourcing [3]. Which is really great...except the effort of finding this out wasn't exactly easy for me and I was pretty interested in finding out what was going on. It seems like this is sort of the middle ground of one still being val
Read the rest
uable and the replacement not being fully ready but at some point you would hope there would be an announcement on the original project's page (or something). As just a consumer/user I can point people I know or projects I manage at this information but what about people who just think "StyleCop is dead" when they see there hasn't really been activity for weeks/months/years/etc? Not as a member of either project it would be nice to communicate findings like this outwardly, do you reach out to the owners of the projects and see if they will do something? Do you just post to the discussions on the old and point to the new? As just the end-user of some of this how do you get other people informed? [1] http://stylecop.codeplex.com/ [2] https://github.com/citizenmatt/StyleCop [3] https://github.com/DotNetAnalyzers/StyleCopAnalyzers
2 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.