HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
drduan
minggeJS
JavaScript2015–2016
drduan / minggeJS

minggeJS

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
850GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-12-15 22:37:38 UTC to 2016-03-28 01:01:43 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsDec 142015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 12016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 28

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 142015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 212015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 282015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 42016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 112016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 182016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 252016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 12016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 82016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 152016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 222016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 292016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 72016-03-07 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 142016-03-14 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 212016-03-21 00:00:00 UTC2016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 282016-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2016-04-04 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
> These libraries basically are JavaScript's "standard library"... they just happen to be optional. Optional is great and I'm siding on building APIs on the user-land side if possible. Unfortunately, having n different libraries basically doing the same thing is just annoying. This thing you call "competition" is just developers egos gone berserk. There's no point in building 2 things that do the same thing, unless it's definitely better (which is good) or unless the point it conveys is "I'm better than you" (which most devs are, really). I mean look at this guy who tries to overtake jQuery 10 years after jQuery started: https://github.com/drduan/minggeJS/blob/pr/95/README_en.md That said, Lodash and Underscore should just merge. Zepto and jQuery should just merge. Immutable and Mori should just merge. Inferno and React should just merge.
In What if we had a great standard library in JavaScript?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.