HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
drhsqlite
fossil-mirror
C2023–2023
drhsqlite / fossil-mirror

fossil-mirror

A test of the ability of the Fossil DVCS to mirror to GitHub

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
240GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A test of the ability of the Fossil DVCS to mirror to GitHub

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-07-23 08:17:49 UTC to 2023-07-23 10:24:09 UTC.

012023-07-23 08:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-23 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 23, 08:002023-07-23 09:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-23 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 23, 09:002023-07-23 10:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-23 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 23, 10:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 23, 08:002023-07-23 08:00:00 UTC2023-07-23 09:00:00 UTC101
Jul 23, 09:002023-07-23 09:00:00 UTC2023-07-23 10:00:00 UTC000
Jul 23, 10:002023-07-23 10:00:00 UTC2023-07-23 11:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
There is something fishy with the repo on github. git repack -a -f -d du -sh .git 65M .git It's also significantly faster to clone after the repack: time git clone --mirror https://github.com/drhsqlite/fossil-mirror 65.10s user 21.22s system 35% cpu 4:05.92 total time git clone --no-local fossil-mirror fossil-no-repack 26.92s user 2.99s system 155% cpu 19.190 total git -C fossil-mirror.git repack -a -f -d time git clone --no-local fossil-mirror fossil-repack 5.42s user 1.18s system 211% cpu 3.121 total Edit: took new measurements with --mirror on the first clone so that the "local" clones actually get all the branches. Also: git gc --aggressive du -sh .git 42M .git
In Why SQLite does not use Git (2018)
I think [0] indicates that it does scale quite well, you can even test by comparing the 2. You can go from cloning to pushing on a repo in half the time. There's branches as well, so while the /timeline[1] seems too busy, you can always drop back to a forum or the bug tracker, which it has already. time fossil clone https://fossil-scm.org/ time git clone https://github.com/drhsqlite/fossil-mirror My results were fossil time > real 5m43.120s user 2m56.532s sys 0m48.246s ls -lh > 60M fossil-scm.fossil git time > real 10m35.043s user 5m58.427s sys 1m10.555s du -sh fossil-mirror/.git/ > 829M [0]: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/stats.wiki [1]: https://fossil-scm.org/home/timeline
In Why SQLite does not use Git (2018)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.