HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
drizzle-team
drizzle-orm
TypeScript2023–2026
drizzle-team / drizzle-orm

drizzle-orm

ORM

12Distinct people
12Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
36.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

ORM

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

do yourself a favor and ditch Prisma. It's a bloody mess of a project and codebase. I recommend https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm to anyone that'll listen.

andrew_ used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 3:30:57 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-02-02 04:48:55 UTC to 2026-07-16 00:04:16 UTC.

02468102023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 5 submissions, 4 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC954
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

9 sources
I would modify this to "Don't use Prisma if you're using serverless" With actual servers and prisma running close to the underlying database, it should be much better. Regarding using joins, that's not necessarily the best choice either. When using simple flat joins naively, you get a lot of repetition for the more toplevel nodes of the join tree, which eventually adds up to a lot of network traffic and allocation. (TypeORM tends to have this issue, for example) What you really want are joins that build the JSON on the server. In MSSQL this can be as simple as `FOR JSON`. In Postgres it can get... a bit more involved - Drizzle can do it: https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/releases#:~:text... This is probably okay, although I do wonder what happens after you hit the compute limits of your database server (i.e. scenarios when you d
Read the rest
on't use things like planetscale). In those cases (again, non-serverless), Prisma's choice might work better as long as it runs close to the DB. It will still likely be slower than the fancy JSON join, but probably need fewer database resources (depending on how its done).
In We migrated to SQL. Our biggest learning? Don't use Prisma

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.