HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Dyalog
OpenAI
OPEN SOURCE2025–2025
Dyalog / OpenAI

OpenAI

Dyalog APL interface to OpenAI API

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Dyalog APL interface to OpenAI API

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-06-06 02:02:16 UTC to 2025-06-11 12:19:53 UTC.

012025-06-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-06 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 6, 00:002025-06-06 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-06 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-06 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-06 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-06 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-07 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-07 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-07 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-07 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-07 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-07 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-08 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-08 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-08 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-08 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-08 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-08 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 8, 18:002025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-09 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-09 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-09 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-10 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-10 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-10 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-10 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-10 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-10 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-11 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-11 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-11 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-11 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-11 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 11, 12:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 6, 00:002025-06-06 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-06 06:00:00 UTC101
Jun 6, 06:002025-06-06 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-06 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 6, 12:002025-06-06 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-06 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 6, 18:002025-06-06 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 7, 00:002025-06-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-07 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 7, 06:002025-06-07 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-07 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 7, 12:002025-06-07 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-07 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 7, 18:002025-06-07 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 8, 00:002025-06-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-08 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 8, 06:002025-06-08 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-08 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 8, 12:002025-06-08 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-08 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 8, 18:002025-06-08 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 9, 00:002025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 9, 06:002025-06-09 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 9, 12:002025-06-09 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 9, 18:002025-06-09 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 10, 00:002025-06-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-10 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 10, 06:002025-06-10 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-10 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 10, 12:002025-06-10 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-10 18:00:00 UTC000
Jun 10, 18:002025-06-10 18:00:00 UTC2025-06-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 11, 00:002025-06-11 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-11 06:00:00 UTC000
Jun 11, 06:002025-06-11 06:00:00 UTC2025-06-11 12:00:00 UTC000
Jun 11, 12:002025-06-11 12:00:00 UTC2025-06-11 18:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
> Array programming is similar to functional programming – the primary way to control execution involves composition of functions – but APL tends to encourage the reliance on global properties and sweeping operations rather than low-level recursion4. This AoC solution is, indeed, quite the functionista! Better yet, it leans heavily into point-free expressions. The style is pretty popular amongst APL language enthusiasts and puzzlers. That said, you actually see quite different APL styles in the wild: - Pointed declarative style, also a popular with functional programmers (e.g. anything like this[0] from the dfns workspace) - Imperative, structured programming, very common in legacy production systems (e.g. this[1] OpenAI API interface) - Object-oriented, also common in somewhat newer production environments (e.g. the HTTP interface[2]) -
Read the rest
Data-parallel style (e.g. Co-dfns[3]) Heck, APL even has lexical and dynamic scope coexisting together. IMHO, it's truly underrated as a language innovator. [0]:https://dfns.dyalog.com/c_match.htm [1]:https://github.com/Dyalog/OpenAI/blob/main/source/OpenAI.apl... [2]:https://github.com/Dyalog/HttpCommand/blob/master/source/Htt... [3]:https://github.com/Co-dfns/Co-dfns/blob/master/cmp/PS.apl
In APL Interpreter – An implementation of APL, written in Haskell (2024)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.