HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
EclipseFdn
publish-extensions
JavaScript2020–2025
EclipseFdn / publish-extensions

publish-extensions

Scripts for publishing VS Code extensions to open-vsx.org

4Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
348GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Scripts for publishing VS Code extensions to open-vsx.org

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-08-04 12:57:51 UTC to 2025-07-15 14:10:48 UTC.

01232020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
If you run part of the software supply chain ecosystem, put it on the web without any kind of "alpha" or "insecure" language that's highly visible to end users on every package, and even distribute professional white papers and marketing-style landing pages to promote it (e.g. https://outreach.eclipse.foundation/openvsx), but create a deployment architecture that executes arbitrary third party code during every deploy (as was the case before https://github.com/EclipseFdn/publish-extensions/pull/881/fi... landed to fix the issue in the link above) - I do indeed think that the Eclipse Foundation bears some responsibility here. And for sure, Cursor and others should have funded security hardening of their extension marketplace. The lion's share of the blame lies on that. But the Eclipse Foundation is in a position to incentivize that investm
Read the rest
ent by making it clear to end users that open-vsx is still at an experimental level of stability and security, rather than promoting it as an enterprise-ready product with white papers and all.
In Code highlighting extension for Cursor AI used for $500k theft
It's updated several times a month https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/releases The biggest caveat would be to be aware of the default connexion to an alternative extension store, https://open-vsx.org, instead of Microsoft's own store, which does not have all the extensions the official store has. But that's less and less an issue, thanks to projects such as https://github.com/open-vsx/publish-extensions. In the worst case, I just manually `git clone`d the desired extension in my local extension folder. Nothing to complain about otherwise
In VS Code – What's the deal with the telemetry?
Hey folks, Geoff here from Gitpod. Very pleased to see there continues to be strong interest in open (and FOSS) software development tooling. VSCodium uses the OpenVSX registry (which Gitpod folks created) because the VS Market place is proprietary and can only be connected to from official Visual Studio branded products. If you can't find an extension when using VSCodium then please send a pull-request to this repository https://github.com/open-vsx/publish-extensions with the identifier and that will help grow the ecosystem of open tooling. ICMYI - We blogged more about this over at: - https://www.gitpod.io/blog/cloud-ide-history - https://www.gitpod.io/blog/openvscode-server-launch - https://www.gitpod.io/blog/open-vsx If you got any questions lemme know. <3
In VSCodium – Free/Libre Open Source Software Binaries of VS Code
Geoff here from Gitpod. Solid write up and overview here. Some minor clarifications and helpful pointers! There’s a community WIP pull request open right now to add Gitea support. The visual studio marketplace is proprietary (by design) and as such we created OpenVSX for the open source ecosystem then gifted it to the eclipse foundation. If you see something not in OpenVSX send the pull request here https://github.com/open-vsx/publish-extensions And, finally, Open source communities are eligible for complimentary plan upgrades to unlimited hours. https://www.gitpod.io/blog/gitpod-for-opensource
In How to code, build, and deploy from an iPad using Gitlab and Gitpod
Send a PR to https://github.com/open-vsx/publish-extensions to close the gap! > One goal of Open VSX is to have extension maintainers publish their extensions according to the documentation. However, you may be missing specific extensions that have not been published by their maintainers: either they are not willing to do it, or they haven't found time to do it, or simply they haven't heard about Open VSX yet. Though the preferred solution for such a situation is to convince the maintainers to start publishing themselves, you can add the extensions here to have them published by our CI workflow.
In Reflections on software development from anywhere on an iPad
There is an alternative public directory: https://open-vsx.org/ It's used by vs codium and theia. It's not just those two plugins, it's also the ms-code.cpptools which has proprietary parts. And that's sad because other plugins are built on it like platformio. Which prevents platformio from being added to ovsx because the cpp tools can't be added to ovsx. Which stinks for me because the cpp proprietary parts are windows only, and all I want to use platformio from is theia running on Linux, but I can't. VS Codium: https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium Theia IDE: https://theia-ide.org/ More details about PlatformIO not being to be added to OVSX: https://github.com/open-vsx/publish-extensions/issues/86 More cpp tools licensing details: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-cpptools/issues/5784 Edit: you can run theia from one computer and use i
Read the rest
t via the browser on another. That's why I was so excited for it. Edit 2: VS Codium, not open codium
In The best Parts of Visual Studio Code are proprietary

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.