HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
edn-query-language
eql
Clojure2019–2020
edn-query-language / eql

eql

EQL is a declarative way to make hierarchical (and possibly nested) selections of information about data requirements. This repository contains the base specs and definitions for EQL parsing, AST, etc.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
392GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

EQL is a declarative way to make hierarchical (and possibly nested) selections of information about data requirements. This repository contains the base specs and definitions for EQL parsing, AST, etc.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-12-26 00:37:33 UTC to 2020-04-13 13:20:59 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012019-12-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-12-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsDec 232019-12-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 172020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-04-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 13

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 232019-12-23 00:00:00 UTC2019-12-30 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 302019-12-30 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 62020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 132020-01-13 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 202020-01-20 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 272020-01-27 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 32020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 102020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 172020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 92020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 162020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 232020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 302020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 62020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 132020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC2020-04-20 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
We just re-evaluated our choices and selected Fulcro. Below is a slightly edited version of how we came to this conclusion. As a business building an extremely ambitious product on a tight budget, we want to be able to: * Focus as much time and thought on building features that bring value to our customers, rather than, for example, building a bespoke protocol between the browser and back-end if a better alternative is available. * Share early iterations of our application with everyone in our organization easily. Capture feedback and push out new iterations quickly. * Be able to support new customers immediately. Our feature road-map will always be in constant flux, but at no point should our ability to make changes with confidence be compromised. In addition to feature development, tests and automation must be priorities. Ou
Read the rest
r development and production environments must match. * Be ready to onboard new team members. "Works on my laptop" is never acceptable. Enough of our application must be documented and automated so that anyone with a technical background "reasonably proficient" in our work can contribute without requiring hand-holding. Or course, we'd never turn down a request for help. Our requirements are: * Clojure, Clojurescript, and Datomic are immutable choices. We love these solutions for their simplicity and expressiveness. We believe these are the best choices available for achieving our long-term business goals. * Be measurable. Our work should be guided by data not guesswork. * Be testable. The entire application should have 100% test coverage as measured by its acceptance or integration tests (not unit tests). Changes should be made with confidence. * Be performant. As builders of both the front-end and back-end components, we should encourage cooperation between them, not purposefully isolate them. Our customers and the end-user experience should be our priorities, not artificial divisions between software components or technical teams. Each component of the application should cooperate to support progressive enhancement where every URL is a real URL that, when requested, returns a server-side rendered page view. Further actions by the user result in browser-side changes through API calls and minimal component updates. * Be pragmatic. We should be eager to innovate when the need arises. However, we should be humble enough to understand that sometimes, as software developers, we can become enamored with new toys that are entertaining, and possibly educational, but offer little business value. We should choose existing solutions to our problems that are acceptable enough over building our own solutions simply because we want to. For example, a standards-based protocol, like https://github.com/edn-query-language/eql, that allows clients to craft their own queries with little to no server-side updates is preferable to our current bespoke solution. * Be documented and supported. Our choices should have active, helpful, and inclusive development communities built around them. Our choices are: * Rum, https://github.com/tonsky/rum Rum is a solid piece of software, created and maintained by @tonsky, that provides a minimal wrapper around react for creating client-side components, and supports server-side rendering. Although rum does not provide a protocol between client and server, nor a client component state-management solution. * Reagent, https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent Together with Re-frame, https://github.com/Day8/re-frame, this is by far the most popular choice for building reactive client components in Clojurescript. These do not include the server-side solutions we need. * Hoplon, http://hoplon.io Hoplon was created in-house at AdZerk, and later spun-out as an open source project. Hoplon is a complete solution although it uses a less intuitive spreadsheet-like method for building applications with little obvious advantage, and would not be compatible with Datomic without considerable effort. * Luminus, https://luminusweb.com Luminus is a complete solution like Ruby-on-Rails, and is tightly coupled to SQL. Like Hoplon, Luminus would not be compatible with Datomic without considerable effort. * Pedestal, http://pedestal.io Pedestal is supported by Cognitect, the custodians of Clojure and the creators of Datomic. Except Pedestal is best suited for building server-side APIs, and applications that need to stream data in "near real-time" to large numbers of concurrently connected clients. * Fulcro, https://fulcro.fulcrologic.com/ Fulcro is based on Om.Next, provides both front-end and back-end components that work well together, includes tools for building and debugging both, supports server-side rendering, and is supported by a diverse community. Paid commercial support is provided by the core developer team at Fulcro Logic. * Datomic Cloud, https://www.datomic.com Datomic Cloud is a special version of the Datomic database that is tightly integrated with AWS. Datomic Cloud includes a set of Cloud Formation templates for running Datomic in AWS, and taking advantage of AWS specific features, such as auto-scaling groups and load-balancers for distributing traffic across a cluster of Datomic peers. Datomic Cloud also includes Ions, https://docs.datomic.com/cloud/ions/ions.html, to help run Clojure functions as AWS Lambdas. Cognitech claims Datomic Cloud is a suitable framework for building complete applications. Unfortunately Datomic Cloud alone is insufficient. Datomic Cloud lacks a framework for building and testing client-side applications, and a protocol for interacting with Ions.
In Luminus – A Clojure Web Framework
If you're looking for potential alternatives to REST and GraphQL, I suggest checking out how Fulcro [1] works together with Pathom [2] using EQL [3]. It's a data-driven full-stack application programming system centered around graph-based UI and data management implemented in Clojure [4]. While React lets you be declarative about your UI, Fulcro lets you be declarative about your entire system - both backend and frontend. Check out this discussion too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21743720 [1] https://fulcro.fulcrologic.com/ [2] https://github.com/wilkerlucio/pathom [3] https://github.com/edn-query-language/eql [4] https://clojure.org/
In Ask HN: Other than REST and GraphQL, what do you guys use?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.