HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
elegantframework
elegant-cli
TypeScript2023–2024
elegantframework / elegant-cli

elegant-cli

✨ Build SEO-friendly websites, super fast full-stack web applications, and much more with Elegant. 💜 Built with Next.js, TipTap, Tailwind CSS, and more.

Command LineWeb DevelopmentProductivity
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
3Distinct people
29Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
221GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

✨ Build SEO-friendly websites, super fast full-stack web applications, and much more with Elegant. 💜 Built with Next.js, TipTap, Tailwind CSS, and more.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

This space is evolving so fast, and I love it! I feel like I am in the right place at the right time to be just so happening to be working on a better and more modern Wordpress…

hoofhearted used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 4:01:40 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month29 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-04-20 00:02:21 UTC to 2024-08-07 18:19:48 UTC.

02462023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 commentsApr 20232023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsDec 20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 20232023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC303
May 20232023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 20232023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC716
Jul 20232023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Aug 20232023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Sep 20232023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Oct 20232023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Nov 20232023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Dec 20232023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20242024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20242024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20242024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20242024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 20242024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20242024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20242024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
hoofhearted·Jul 7, 2023
I’ve actually been exploring this concept myself with a blogging side project I’m working on. Things were “mehhh” for developer interest for the first month or so, as a I was working off of an internal todo list. I didn’t think anyone cared about my 300 line long todo.txt file, but then I started to wonder if I should find a way to put that doc out in the open for developers to follow, and possibly jump in and contribute. I had a hinkling that I could use GitHub issues to help with this, but I believed the title “issues” would hurt my project. I was under the impression that a new open source project with a single contributor, and a ton of open “issues” would look bad to developers. I started to inquire with devs on IH and hear about using issues for feature tracking. Much to my surprise, I got an overwhelming “yes, you need to use issues
Read the rest
”. I was also told not to worry about the misleading “issues” title, and that enough developers were knowledgeable enough to know they weren’t just bug reports. As I started to open issues, and ask for help; surprisingly I started getting traffic and interest. The more issues I opened, and the more open I was online about my code and plans for it; the more followers and contributors I’ve gotten. My plan at this point is to just follow Gitlabs model, and go full open transparency with everything. My side project mentioned above can be downloaded here: https://github.com/elegantframework/elegant-cli
In Gitlab.com is down
hoofhearted·Jul 5, 2023
I really didn’t hear about Astro until more recently after I started playing with blogging using Next.js. I gave Astro a look over and promised myself to be open minded; but I wasn’t really digging how opinionated their code was to themselves. Thousands and thousands of devs built on top of each others JavaScript improvements for years, and then Astro comes along and decides that us developers need to learn a new “.astro” syntax as well. Imagine if Tailwind or Laravel forced you into funky .tailwind/.laravel named files because they felt a certain way about their name. I took this as a sign that Astro might become a very money hunger shark at the first drop of blood like other popular CMS providers have done in recent memory. I’m working on a free open source side project now for fun with the goal of helping more people create and own the
Read the rest
ir own content online, without paying an arm and a leg for it. I’d love more support and feedback if anyone has any to give :) If you feel that developers need an open and extensible product for creating content, please give me a star, and open some PR’s and issues. https://github.com/elegantframework/elegant-cli
In Astro framework lowers competitors by ~40% on performance graph to looks better

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.