raddebugger

what evidence is? It's the thing you say you can't provide. You haven't been able to take the most obvious uncontentious claim from me. But if I'm not explaining as you say, what are YOU doing? Are you seriously too stubborn to accept that exposing a destructor (or any other method) in a header file requires exposing the class's definition (private method declarations including signatures, include internally used headers for internally used data structures, which again have methods, which have dependencies...) in C++? And when any of those not-real-dependencies changes, you have to rebuild everything needlessly? Are you somehow mentally unable to see how long compile times can subtly degrade a project over time? Because I didn't need any youtuber personality to find that out for myself. And for some humility, the fact that I was able to see that suggests it's not particularly hard to find out. > Why don't you link something besides a name of a big C project and explain it. The idea that someone making a project in C somehow means other features and tools are terrible isn't even logic. That would mean that one project in a language from the 70s would negate every garbage collected and dynamically typed scripting language. And also I didn't claim it, you fantasized it and I can't help but ridicule you for having such wild ideas. To make such claims you would actually have a closer look at a project. > By your own logic the fact that https://github.com/chromium/chromium has 1.7 million commits to your project's 4,385 means that modern C++ is more than 380 times as effective. How is that by my own logic? But please accept that this is the work of mainly 1-2 persons, and compare _hours_ of build time (35 MLOC) to 3 seconds of build time (300K LOC). > You think that somehow something simple like automatically running a function you have to run anyway is a problem, it's nonsense. You are misrepresenting what I've said so badly it's not funny anymore. I've said multiple times that maybe this function shouldn't even exist. And even if the function has to exist, maybe it shouldn't be coupled so hard, at a language level, with the actual state & logic definitions. I did provide reasons why I've perceived the coupling to be an architectural problem. I would be very open to a discussion when this can or can not be a serious problem and what are possible tradeoffs and points in the design space. It wouldn't make me feel bad and wouldn't take away from my claim that there is actual evidence for the issues being discussed. But with a person like you, that's not possible. > That's a matter of dependencies and doesn't have anything to do with destructors. I've explained multiple times why I think it does. If you want a destructor declared in C++, you have to give the full class definition. > Now we're to the "I don't like how you're saying it" part of the no evidence playbook. This happens when someone can't admit that they don't have any information and they can't believe that people won't accept them repeating claims as evidence. No, it happens when I can't believe how you haven't managed to stop talking down on me instead of making an effort to be anything other than an annoying adversary. That's all. > I think it's time to admit to yourself that you have accepted some internet youtuber personalities as a religious belief and that you haven't questioned these beliefs with thoughts that go beyond the claims of the cult. I think it's time for you to shut up. You are providing zero evidence for your baseless (even counter-factual) accusations towards myself. What you say makes ZERO sense.

e every garbage collected and dynamically typed scripting language. It makes no sense in any way. It's like saying because someone road a bike 20 miles cars are terrible. Do you not understand the concept that I can't explain the world to you from the ground up? You don't seem to be able to explain anything at all. You say no to everything without trying to understand it. You don't give any explanations, they are just claims, do you understand that? Do you know what evidence is? It's the thing you say you can't provide. You think that somehow something simple like automatically running a function you have to run anyway is a problem, it's nonsense. By your own logic the fact that https://github.com/chromium/chromium has 1.7 million commits to your project's 4,385 means that modern C++ is more than 380 times as effective. for example the thing about C++ class features (destructors, methods...) leading to exposure of internals in public headers That's a matter of dependencies and doesn't have anything to do with destructors. you're the single worst interaction I've had on this platform. Now we're to the "I don't like how you're saying it" part of the no evidence playbook. This happens when someone can't admit that they don't have any information and they can't believe that people won't accept them repeating claims as evidence. Your own project has plenty of the bugs that destructors and contained memory allocation avoid. Raw heap allocations, raw mem copies etc. https://github.com/EpicGames/raddebugger/issues/855 Here's a complex memory cleanup race condition that's 'solved' with a sleep function. https://github.com/EpicGames/raddebugger/issues/735 even the most common lore I think it's time to admit to yourself that you have accepted some internet youtuber personalities as a religious belief and that you haven't questioned these beliefs with thoughts that go beyond the claims of the cult.

rack of them over time), but they're way easier to solve than the UI/state sync issue. Examples of real-non-video-game software that uses it are File Pilot [2] and RAD Debugger [3], which are modern desktop UI applications with all the modern desktop UI application bells and whistles. [1] https://github.com/ocornut/imgui [2] https://filepilot.tech/ [3] https://github.com/EpicGamesExt/raddebugger

GB of memory and are very good at prioritising fixing memory issues seeing a whopping 5% improvement for p95 of users": https://www.reddit.com/r/discordapp/comments/1pej7l7/restart... Doesn't mean I have to write Discord to criticise it. All I need is an understanding of rather basic performance and of general engineering practices. And also, you've probably failed to even understand what they are criticising/saying: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46315616