HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ErisBlastar
cplusequality
C++2013–2018
ErisBlastar / cplusequality

cplusequality

Feminist Software Foundation C+=, a new language for us feminists

9Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
976GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Feminist Software Foundation C+=, a new language for us feminists

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-12-16 20:53:43 UTC to 2018-06-07 15:28:57 UTC.

012342013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

9 sources
Well, here's a funny story. After being kicked off of GitHub, the project was moved to GitLab, but on GitLab, there was nothing but a notice that the project had moved to Gitorious. There was nothing at all on Gitorious, and doing a Google seatch showed me that the project could be found... wait for it... once again on GitHub. https://github.com/ErisBlastar/cplusequality Either they repented of their views about censoring satire, they haven't noticed it's back, or they think it's a real thing. <shrug>
In What Will Microsoft's GitHub Buy Mean for Controversial Code?
>The real question is: is a repo purge going to follow from their internal purge? Will they start deleting projects with diverging political views? They've already done that. https://github.com/FeministSoftwareFoundation/C-plus-Equalit... However, they continue to host a mirror of it: https://github.com/ErisBlastar/cplusequality Not sure why they didn't allow the "official" one but allow the mirror. Guess they just wanted the ability to say they took it down for PR purposes.
In GitHub is undergoing a full-blown overhaul as execs and employees depart

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.