HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
everpix
Everpix-Intelligence
Observability2014–2014
everpix / Everpix-Intelligence · Archived

Everpix-Intelligence

Uncensored Everpix metrics, financials and business data for your perusing

13Distinct people
14Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Uncensored Everpix metrics, financials and business data for your perusing

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week14 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-01-10 23:15:58 UTC to 2014-08-01 22:56:36 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

02462014-01-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 commentsJan 62014-01-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments2014-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-02-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-02-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-02-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-03-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-03-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-03-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-03-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-03-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2014-03-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 142014-04-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-05-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-05-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-05-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-05-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-05-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-05-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-05-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-05-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-06-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-06-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-06-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-06-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-06-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-06-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 28

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 62014-01-06 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-13 00:00:00 UTC716
Jan 132014-01-13 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-20 00:00:00 UTC321
Jan 202014-01-20 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 272014-01-27 00:00:00 UTC2014-02-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 32014-02-03 00:00:00 UTC2014-02-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 102014-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2014-02-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 172014-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2014-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242014-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 32014-03-03 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 102014-03-10 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 172014-03-17 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 242014-03-24 00:00:00 UTC2014-03-31 00:00:00 UTC303
Mar 312014-03-31 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 72014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 142014-04-14 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 212014-04-21 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 282014-04-28 00:00:00 UTC2014-05-05 00:00:00 UTC000
May 52014-05-05 00:00:00 UTC2014-05-12 00:00:00 UTC000
May 122014-05-12 00:00:00 UTC2014-05-19 00:00:00 UTC000
May 192014-05-19 00:00:00 UTC2014-05-26 00:00:00 UTC000
May 262014-05-26 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22014-06-02 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 92014-06-09 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 162014-06-16 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 232014-06-23 00:00:00 UTC2014-06-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 302014-06-30 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 72014-07-07 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 142014-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 212014-07-21 00:00:00 UTC2014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 282014-07-28 00:00:00 UTC2014-08-04 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
About Everpix Everpix was started in 2011 with the goal of solving the Photo Mess, an increasingly real pain point in people's life photo collections, through ambitious engineering and user experience. Our startup was angel and VC funded with $2.3M raised over its lifetime. After 2 years of research and product development, and although having a very enthusiastic user base of early adopters combined with strong PR momentum, we didn't succeed in raising our Series A in the highly competitive VC funding market. Unable to continue operating our business, we had to announce our upcoming shutdown on November 5th, 2013. High-Level Metrics At the time of its shutdown announcement, the Everpix platform had 50,000 signed up users (including 7,000 subscribers) with 400 millions photos imported, while generating subscription sales of $40,000 / month during the last 3 months (i.e. enough money to cover variable costs, but not the fixed costs of the business). The following high-level metrics are from September 2012, when we started selling subscriptions, to October 2013, the last month before our shutdown announcement: Retained users: users who used the Web, iOS, Mac, Windows Everpix apps or opened a Flashback email. Complete Dataset Building a startup is about taking on a challenge and working countless hours on solving it. Most startups do not make it but rarely do they reveal the story behind, leaving their users often frustrated. Because we wanted the Everpix community to understand some of the dynamics in the startup world and why we had to come to such a painful ending, we worked closely with a reporter from The Verge who chronicled our last couple weeks. The resulting article generated extensive coverage and also some healthy discussions around some of our high-level metrics and financials. There was a lot more internal data we wanted to share but it wasn't the right time or place. With the Everpix shutdown behind us, we had the chance to put together a significant dataset of hundreds of files covering all aspects of our business. We hope this rare and uncensored inside look at the internals of a startup will benefit the startup community. Here are some example of common startup questions this dataset helps answering: What are investment terms for consecutive convertible notes and an equity seed round? What does the end cap table look like? (see here) How does a Silicon Valley startup spend its raised money during 2 years? (see here) What does a VC pitch deck look like? (see here) What kinds of reasons do VCs give when they pass? (see here) What are the open rate and click rate of transactional and marketing emails? (see here) What web traffic do various news websites generate? (see here and here) What are the conversion rate from product landing page to sign up for new visitors? (see here) How fast do people purchase a subscription after signing up to a freemium service? (see here and here) Which countries have higher suscription rates? (see here and here) What frustrates people the most abour their photo collection? (see here) Do people actually edit their digital photos? (see here) What would it take to acquire customers through online ads in such a business? (see here) How much price sensitive are consumers for such online services i.e. what's the price elasticity? (see here) The dataset is organized as follow: Anonymized VC Feedback.md: Unedited feedback from VCs who passed on Everpix External Metrics: Raw metrics retrieved from external systems like Google Analytics or AWS billing Financials.md: High-level financials with fundraising and final P&L Internal Metrics: Raw and computed metrics from our service from photos imported to subscription sales Investor Reports: Monthly investor reports detailing the progress, strategy and ups and downs of Everpix from the inside Online Paid Customer Acquisition Test Results.pdf: Results from early test ad campaigns for paid customer acquisition in Summer 2013 Presentation Slides: The slides used to introduce Everpix to press and investors along with the latest version of our more extensive VC pitch deck Press Coverage.csv: List of press articles covering Everpix Product Videos: Everpix presentation videos made during the product life Public Feedback: Everpix user reviews from Apple & Google app stores and tweets following the shutdown announcement Google Consumer Surveys: Exclusive consumer insight research about people and their photos done with Google Consumer Surveys Timeline & Numbers.md: Everpix product timeline and numbers The metrics in the dataset were "frozen" as of November 6th, 2013 (the day following the announcement of Everpix's shutdown) and represent more than 90% of all available Everpix metrics. Only metrics covered by NDAs with partners or metrics exposing identifiable Everpix users information have been omitted. To maximize reusability, metrics are formatted as CSV files (using UTF-8 text encoding) and with the first row being the column names.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

14 sources
It might have been enough for them to keep investor interest [new round of funding] and continue. It wouldn't have put them in the black. https://github.com/everpix/Everpix-Intelligence/blob/master/... From that, it looks like their loss over 26 months was ~$300,000. Their total AWS costs was less than $400,000 over the same period. Downloading 1 GB = 4x the cost of the S3 storage at the reduced prices. If everything is viewed once [doubtful], that is 4x the price of the S3 storage. Given that ti would be impossible to reduce the total cost by even 50%, let alone the 75% they'd need to break approximately even. I didn't see S3 broken out specifically anywhere which is why I'm just making an educated guess. :/
In Amazon S3 Pricing Changes Effective April 1, 2014
I did some spreadsheet-ing to look at the "profitability" of their userbase. If the business were sustainable, then Monthly Recurring Revenue [1] would be higher than the cost to service the customers [2]. If not, then growing the userbase just increases total monthly losses (assuming a steady freemium conversion rate). In Everpix's case, it appears they were growing unsustainably. Their data shows that all the way up until February 2013, they were spending $3 on AWS for every $1 of MRR. That's scary, because it means that a new customer bringing $1 MRR was actually increasing their monthly losses due to usage costs! Things got better though. In March and April 2013, a surge in premium users seems to have shifted the balance in the right direction. But still, for May 2013 until the shutdown they were spending $1.20-1.40 on AWS to service
Read the rest
every $1 MRR. So growth in their userbase was actually increasing their total burn rate, which makes growth unsustainable. You can see the spreadsheet analysis here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap7fmpANG_0QdHV... [1] https://github.com/everpix/Everpix-Intelligence/blob/master/... [2] https://github.com/everpix/Everpix-Intelligence/blob/master/...
In Uncensored Everpix metrics, financials and slides

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.