HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
extjs
connect
HISTORICAL RECORD2010–2010
extjs / connect · Not publicly available

connect

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-06-13 15:16:39 UTC to 2010-07-08 16:43:22 UTC.

012010-06-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 132010-06-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 252010-06-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-06-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-06-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-07-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-07-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 8

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 132010-06-13 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-14 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 142010-06-14 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 152010-06-15 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 162010-06-16 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 172010-06-17 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 182010-06-18 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 192010-06-19 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 202010-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC110
Jun 212010-06-21 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 222010-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 232010-06-23 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 242010-06-24 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 252010-06-25 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 262010-06-26 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 272010-06-27 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 282010-06-28 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 292010-06-29 00:00:00 UTC2010-06-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 302010-06-30 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 12010-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 22010-07-02 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 32010-07-03 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 42010-07-04 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 52010-07-05 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 62010-07-06 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 72010-07-07 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 82010-07-08 00:00:00 UTC2010-07-09 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
That's not really a valid test. NodeJS can easily make use of multiple cores with child processes, but by design, it's a very low-level API, so that stuff isn't used by the HTTP server by default. In other words, it doesn't assume you want to use multiple processes for your HTTP server. Maybe you want to use them for something else. (Like, if you have an HTTP server and an IRC server sharing the same box, and you want to make sure they are isolated from one another, or something.) Check out http://github.com/kriszyp/multi-node or http://github.com/extjs/Connect for examples of web servers that will blow Clojure out of the water in this benchmark. When leveraging multiple cores, NodeJS is closer to nginx in terms of performance than it is to Jetty or Django. (Of course, nginx uses almost no memory, and NodeJS has this big honkin VM ju
Read the rest
ggling JavaScript contexts, so it's not as space-efficient.)
In Clojure's edge on Node.js

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.