printf

> It uses a few mb of contiguous shared memory and periodically calling a function from a host thread. Well, if someone wants to shoot themselves in the head, then by all means... > Unless you only want sprintf or similar in which case neither is needed. > ... Generally you don't want libc calls in numerical kernels doing useful > stuff - the most common request was for printf as a debugging crutch I have actually adapted a library for that particular case: https://github.com/eyalroz/printf/ I started with a standalone printf-family implementation targetting embedded devices, and (among other things) adapted it for use also with CUDA. > I mostly wanted mmap. Does it really make sense to make a gazillion mmap calls from the threads of your GPU kernel? I mean, is it really not always better to mmap on the CPU side? At most, I might do it a

It's only been a few years since I've come to feel I can rely on C compilers all supporting C99, for a library I'm maintaing [1]. And after a couple of years, sure enough - I get an issue opened asking for C89 compatibility because of some arcane embedded toolchain or what-not. So, C23? ... that's nice and all, but, let's talk about it in 20 years or so T_T [1]: https://github.com/eyalroz/printf