The Faster CPython team at least is aware of the paper and probably will look into it
https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/707
In Deegen: A JIT-Capable VM Generator for Dynamic Languagesfaster-cpython
ideas
OPEN SOURCE2021–2025
faster-cpython / ideas
ideas
Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.
33Distinct people
44Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.7KGitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
A public description has not been verified.
Where it is used
No documented product use was verified in the last source check.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:00:58 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by year44 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2021-05-13 10:05:48 UTC to 2025-12-25 16:28:05 UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| 2022 | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 16 | 6 | 10 |
| 2023 | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 2024 | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 2025 | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 4 | 2 | 2 |
From the project README
An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.
Read the project’s introduction
Faster CPython Ideas
Discussion and work tracker for Faster CPython project.
New ideas should be created as new issues. It is ok if the idea is not fully formed -- we treat them as discussions to arrive at something actionable. (We had previously used discussions for this, but that is now deprecated).
The CPython issue tracker should be used for actual work-in-progress.
Some links to presentations and other preliminary documentation:
Guido's slides at the 2021 Python Language Summit
Mark's slides explaining Tiers of Execution
PEP 659
Published Results
Benchmarking and pystats results are published to the benchmarking-public repo.
Read the full README on GitHubWhat Hacker News says
5 sourcesFaster CPython 3.14 high level plan
11 points · Open discussionLower latency native calls in Python would be extremely useful, thank you for your work! Is the following GitHub issue the right place to monitor progress? https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/546
I'm open to doing some benchmarking. Several of my libraries have pure CPython bindings (StringZilla, UCall, SimSIMD), and all perform low-latency SIMD-accelerated ops, so might be a good testing ground :)
In Type information for faster Python C extensions