HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ferrumc-rs
ferrumc
Rust2025–2025
ferrumc-rs / ferrumc

ferrumc

A reimplementation of the minecraft server in rust.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A reimplementation of the minecraft server in rust.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-04-13 12:09:44 UTC to 2025-09-28 02:16:54 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 72025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 302025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 22

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 72025-04-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 142025-04-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 212025-04-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 282025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC000
May 52025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC000
May 122025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC000
May 192025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC000
May 262025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 92025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 162025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 232025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 302025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 72025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 142025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 212025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 282025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 42025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 112025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 182025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 252025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 12025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 82025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 152025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 222025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I don't know of any active implementation in Go, but there is actually a nice parallel in Rust: Valence [0]. It follows the same framework approach as opposed to a plug-and-play package, like Glowstone (now abandoned). You also have Pumpkin [1] and Ferrum [2] that are trying to implement a vanilla-like server, but are a little ways off still. The former has an interesting plugin system already; works with shared libraries. One of the neat things of these Rust implementations, apart from good base performance (though Java's JIT can be pretty good on this type of software), is the memory footprint, one of the main painpoints of hosting large server networks. The official server implementation is extremely memory hungry, with lots of allocations everywhere; even with optimization forks like Paper, you can't really run away from it too much.
Read the rest
Minestom is also nicer in that regard, but not on the same level as Pumpkin or Ferrum. The Minestom people are also waiting on Project Valhalla to unlock some optimizations on that front. Another interesting approach would be Erlang or some other BEAM language, but there isn't much activity on that front either, as far as I know. McEx [3] was pretty neat, but it has long since been quiet. [0]: https://valence.rs [1]: https://pumpkinmc.org [2]: https://github.com/ferrumc-rs/ferrumc [3]: https://github.com/McEx/McEx
In Minestom – An open-source, lightweight Minecraft server built from the ground up

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.