HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
firecow
gitlab-ci-local
TypeScript2022–2025
firecow / gitlab-ci-local

gitlab-ci-local

Tired of pushing to test your .gitlab-ci.yml?

6Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Tired of pushing to test your .gitlab-ci.yml?

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-07-03 11:13:41 UTC to 2025-03-20 13:46:00 UTC.

01232022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

7 sources
I've been thinking lately that how I could do some integration testing FOR my CI-pipelines. My client has very complex pipelines which has business logic inside them and every week we run into new bugs and regressions. I can't think any easy way to write tests for them to make it harder to break when developing new features. Btw. Gitlab allows splitting your pipelines to multiple files using include[1]. Also we have used gitlab-ci-local[2] to run our pipelines locally when developing them. 1: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/includes.html 2: https://github.com/firecow/gitlab-ci-local
In Ask HN: How can we make the current CI/CD ecosystem better?
> One thing that would be nice, however, would be the ability to run the entire pipeline locally. This cost me many hours of waiting for the Gitlab CI runner when debugging non-trivial pipelines, when the issue was something that did not have to do with the script steps inside of the jobs but rather how the Gitlab runner handled things. I've found gitlab-ci-local [1] which actually does run the Gitlab pipeline locally, although I had to write some boilerplaye scripts to set up all the necessary 'CI_FOO_SOMETHING' environment variables before running the tool. (Which sometimes came back to bite me because the issue was actually in the content of some of those environment variables). It's still a very good tool. [1] https://github.com/firecow/gitlab-ci-local
In The End of CI

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.