HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
floatinghotpot
cordova-admob-pro
Java2022–2022
floatinghotpot / cordova-admob-pro

cordova-admob-pro

:fire: Cordova Plugin for Google AdMob, DFP, ADX. Easy monetization using mobile Ad, with single line of JavaScript. Compatible with Cordova CLI, Inoic, PhoneGap Build, etc.

11Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
720GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

:fire: Cordova Plugin for Google AdMob, DFP, ADX. Easy monetization using mobile Ad, with single line of JavaScript. Compatible with Cordova CLI, Inoic, PhoneGap Build, etc.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-01-26 15:28:35 UTC to 2022-01-26 20:47:05 UTC.

012342022-01-26 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 commentsJan 26, 15:002022-01-26 16:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2022-01-26 17:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 26, 17:002022-01-26 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2022-01-26 19:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-26 20:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-26 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsJan 26, 20:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 26, 15:002022-01-26 15:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 16:00:00 UTC404
Jan 26, 16:002022-01-26 16:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 17:00:00 UTC303
Jan 26, 17:002022-01-26 17:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 18:00:00 UTC101
Jan 26, 18:002022-01-26 18:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 19:00:00 UTC303
Jan 26, 19:002022-01-26 19:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 20:00:00 UTC000
Jan 26, 20:002022-01-26 20:00:00 UTC2022-01-26 21:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

13 sources
That's entirely false. The plugin offers three license options. https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/wiki/Lic... > 3. Win-win partnership > And, if you don't have enough money yet to get a license, or don't have a PayPal account, here is another flexible option worth considering, no need to pay a cent. We may call it partnership. > We maintain, support, and version update for any plugin issues, you don't worry about its update or bugfix, just use it for free, and focus on your app or game logic. > Ship our code with yours to end-user, no need paying a cent at all, instead, share 2 percent ad traffic, so that we can both benefit and cover our cost to maintain and enhance this project. The problem is the plugin author silently raised that "share 2 percent ad traffic" to 30%.
In An ad plugin was stealing revenue for a year and I didn't even notice
> Read the license of what you're using Here's the license: https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/blob/mas... It's MIT. Here's what they say "If you have used this plugin for FREE but monetized more than $1000, you are also required to get a license, or share us some Ad traffic as stated in win-win partnership model below" If the MIT license is correct, they are lying: people don't need to get a license. The users already have a license that covers absolutely everything and they even have the right to edit the plugin to remove the % cut altogether. Other things they are lying about, in their wiki https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/wiki/Lic... "Reminder: copy the code, change a plugin name, without feature enhancement, then publish to npm, is not allowed." This is just false. The existing MIT license absolute
Read the rest
ly allows changing the name and republishing to npm. Perhaps they just don't understand what is open source about. Absolutely all open source licenses allow forks.
In An ad plugin was stealing revenue for a year and I didn't even notice
From their license agreement: > If you have used this plugin for FREE but monetized more than $1000, you are also required to get a license, or share us some Ad traffic as stated in win-win partnership model below. https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/wiki/Lic... The project however includes the following the license: https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/blob/mas... Surely releasing code under an MIT license makes their statement invalid. Why would I be "required to get a license" and offered a couple of commercial options? It sounds like they need to get some legal help to properly license the project in the way they want to. Furthermore, pricing should be clear. It's deceptive to hide it within their so-called "license" section. As a developer, why would I read the license section if it's clearly marked wit
Read the rest
hin GitHub as being licensed under MIT and has a LICENSE file confirming that?
In An ad plugin was stealing revenue for a year and I didn't even notice
AdMob Pro has the exact same license (https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/blob/mas...) and I see no reason whatsoever why someone using a product named "AdMob Pro" would be unable to use it as free and open source without support, certainly the name of the product does not influence that. The author has written their license poorly in a stupid manner that allows everyone to use their product for free - that's why lawyers are useful and why for small developers it's a very good recommendation to use one of standard licenses instead of trying to write their own from scratch. As of now, perhaps due to the author's legal incompetence, the license also allows free usage for commercial purposes.
In An ad plugin was stealing revenue for a year and I didn't even notice

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.