HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
franciscop
server
JavaScript2016–2021
franciscop / server

server

:desktop_computer: Simple and powerful server for Node.js

2Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

:desktop_computer: Simple and powerful server for Node.js

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:56:55 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-12-30 15:11:26 UTC to 2021-04-17 11:15:43 UTC.

0123452016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
> Note: this option can be ignored and server.js will work with both .pug and .hbs (Handlebars) file types. [1] : https://github.com/franciscop/server/blob/master/package.jso... I think around express 3 the guys decided to go with a modular approach and decouple the server from any of those heavy ( render ) libraries, as well as body-parser ( once it was core module in express itself ). My really friendly feedback is that I think express carries so much experience that it will be really hard to replace it with something so monolithic. I use express for REST APIs as well as full web app, where I need no render engine and having this installed on my server is an overkill. Best approach I would think of is having someone rewrite express from scratch and call it express 5, while keeping the same balance of core and extra functionality, as wel
Read the rest
l as new async / promise goodies.
In Show HN: Server.js – A modern Express alternative
Good article and callout for those projects (and mine). I am doing an express alternative[1] with something that is not secure as a temporary session secret[2] formed with `secret: 'secret-' + parseInt(1000000 * Math.random())` so I'll modify it to use a real random key from a crypto library or display a prominent warning. Then I am also documenting it in a small production security guide [3]. Also, if the key in the documentation is used there's a warning[4] similar to how Dropbox stops you from using 'correct-horse-battery-stapler' as a password. If you have any other tip/recommendation I'd be really thankful. BTW, doesn't SSL/TLS mitigate this a lot? Like, if the user is using SSL then only with physical access to a decrypted device would an attacker be able to impersonate the user, limiting greatly the possible attacks. And if someone
Read the rest
has access to your decrypted device then you have bigger problems. Though devs who don't change 'super secret' are probably probably less likely to set up https... Edit: I almost didn't include the BTW comment because I agree that it is an important part of security, so I didn't want to make it sound less severe, but I am curious about attack possibilities with https enabled. [1] https://serverjs.io/ [2] https://github.com/franciscop/server/blob/master/src/config/... [3] https://github.com/franciscop/server/issues/3 [4] https://github.com/franciscop/server/blob/master/src/config/...
In One Line of Code That Compromises Your Server

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.