HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
FranxYao
chain-of-thought-hub
Jupyter Notebook2023–2023
FranxYao / chain-of-thought-hub

chain-of-thought-hub

Benchmarking large language models' complex reasoning ability with chain-of-thought prompting

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Benchmarking large language models' complex reasoning ability with chain-of-thought prompting

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-05-30 21:52:56 UTC to 2023-05-31 11:49:20 UTC.

012023-05-30 21:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-30 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 30, 21:002023-05-30 22:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-30 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-30 23:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 01:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 02:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 03:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 04:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 31, 04:002023-05-31 05:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 07:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 08:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 09:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-31 10:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-05-31 11:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-31 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 31, 11:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 30, 21:002023-05-30 21:00:00 UTC2023-05-30 22:00:00 UTC110
May 30, 22:002023-05-30 22:00:00 UTC2023-05-30 23:00:00 UTC000
May 30, 23:002023-05-30 23:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 00:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 00:002023-05-31 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 01:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 01:002023-05-31 01:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 02:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 02:002023-05-31 02:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 03:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 03:002023-05-31 03:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 04:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 04:002023-05-31 04:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 05:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 05:002023-05-31 05:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 06:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 06:002023-05-31 06:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 07:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 07:002023-05-31 07:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 08:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 08:002023-05-31 08:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 09:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 09:002023-05-31 09:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 10:00:00 UTC000
May 31, 10:002023-05-31 10:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 11:00:00 UTC101
May 31, 11:002023-05-31 11:00:00 UTC2023-05-31 12:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
It's not just you. Here's a bit of research you can cite: > GPT-4 from its website and Bubeck et al Mar 2023. Note that the version that Bubeck uses is GPT-4 Early which is supposedly to be more powerful than GPT-4 Launch (OpenAI paid a lot of alignment tax to make GPT-4 safer). https://github.com/FranxYao/chain-of-thought-hub Anecdotally, there seemed to be a golden set of weeks in late April to early May that seemed like "peak GPT" (GPT-4), followed by heavy topic and knowledge mitigation since, then -- just this week -- adding back some "chain of thought" or "show your work" ("lets go step by step" style) for math. I say anecdotally because I could just be prompting it wrong.
In Ask HN: Is it just me or GPT-4's quality has significantly deteriorated lately?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.