HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
fsharp
fsharp-compiler-docs
F#2015–2015
fsharp / fsharp-compiler-docs

fsharp-compiler-docs

Doc build for FSharp.Compiler.Service

Languages & CompilersLearning & Reference
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
281GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Doc build for FSharp.Compiler.Service

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-09-19 20:32:36 UTC to 2015-10-16 17:30:27 UTC.

012015-09-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 192015-09-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 22015-10-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 16

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 192015-09-19 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-20 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 202015-09-20 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 212015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 222015-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 232015-09-23 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 242015-09-24 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 252015-09-25 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 262015-09-26 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 272015-09-27 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 282015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 292015-09-29 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 302015-09-30 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 12015-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 22015-10-02 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 32015-10-03 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 42015-10-04 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 52015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 62015-10-06 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 72015-10-07 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 82015-10-08 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 92015-10-09 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 102015-10-10 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 112015-10-11 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 122015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 132015-10-13 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 142015-10-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 152015-10-15 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 162015-10-16 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-17 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Nelkins·Oct 16, 2015
"Code reviews are described as 'technical debt' and some say this ‘debt’ amounts to a trillion dollars globally." Does anybody else share this view, or is the wording just awkward here? In my experience code reviews help to remove technical debt, rather than accrue it. Their dashboards look nice. Coming from the .NET world, I know that Resharper has had a lot of that kind of functionality as part of its Visual Studio extension [1]. And apparently you can also build your own custom compiler rules for both F# and C#, as both have a compiler-as-a-service[2][3]. I'm sure similar tools exist for other languages as well. [1] https://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/features/code_analysis.h... [2] https://github.com/fsharp/FSharp.Compiler.Service [3] https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn
In Codacy Raises Raises $1.1M to Kill Off Unnecessary Code Reviews

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.