ipr

> C++ has virtually zero tooling CMake, Meson, Waf, Conan, Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, CLion, Intel VTune, GDB, LLDB, XCode, Artifactory, SonarQube, clang-tidy, clang-format, astyle, Incredibuild... > Comparing CMake to cargo is like comparing fifth century fireworks to the Space Shuttle You are wrong here. Cargo serves a set of fixed "this-is-how-to-do-it" thing. In C++ you can build anything. I do not mean it is better, but C++ software already exists and that is the solution that it works better for it. :) > and the committee is not interested in ever working on that https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p08... Interoperability effort for modules: https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr

In related news, Stroustrup's and dos Reis's tool ( http://stroustrup.com/gdr-bs-macis09.pdf , http://stroustrup.com/sofsem10.pdf , http://stroustrup.com/icsm-2012-demacro.pdf ) finally showed up on Github ( https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/ipr ).