gstack

I like using grill me in conjunction with obra superpowers spec driven development https://www.aihero.dev/skills-grill-me https://github.com/obra/superpowers When I'm doing something quite complex I'll also throw in gstack office hours but I find that its usually overkill for many things https://github.com/garrytan/gstack I do often use the /qa skill regardless though. I always hated QA because it was so monotonous and it required a level of organization and creativity i never had (i mean im the developer so if I thought of edge cases id have solved for them) I like that /qa covers and documents every edge case that it tested and I can nudge it about other ones

In a tangential earlier release, Gary Tan's own gstack: https://github.com/garrytan/gstack Use Garry Tan's exact Claude Code setup: 23 opinionated tools that serve as CEO, Designer, Eng Manager, Release Manager, Doc Engineer, and QA

To the best of my knowledge Linus Torvalds isn't posting walls of text to Github breathlessly announcing he's 810x-ed [1] his "logical lines of code/day" compared to what he was doing in 2013. And, lest you think generating "600,000 lines of production code in 60 days" [2] is potentially problematic, has also fully solved the primary failure modes of AI coding identified by Andrej Karpathy, once and for all: "Karpathy's four failure modes? Already covered." [1] As someone who has experienced mania, including with a programming bent specifically, it's hard not to raise an eyebrow at the idiosyncratic human-y bits of his thinking floating up from the sea of em-dashes and it's not X it's Y in his manifestos. Plus volunteering this [3] in an interview: “I sleep, like, four hours a night right now,” he told his interviewer, fellow VC Bill Gurl

> Either way, the instability of this industry due to the insane amounts of cargo culting every time <insert big thing> comes along has made me really question whether I want to stick around. Whatever you do, don't click this link: https://github.com/garrytan/gstack/

See also this insanity: https://github.com/garrytan/gstack/

Show them this[1], and if it doesn't sober them up with its absurdity, at least they'll be occupied with something other than treating LinkedIn fluffers as prophets and trying to gaslight you into tanking production [1] https://github.com/garrytan/gstack

E.g. https://github.com/garrytan/gstack In the last 60 days I have written over 600,000 lines of production code — 35% tests — and I am doing 10,000 to 20,000 usable lines of code per day as a part-time part of my day while doing all my duties as CEO of YC. That is not a typo. Not a typo. A delusion. This code's writer was in fact a bot.

Hi HN, I forked Garry Tan's [gstack](https://github.com/garrytan/gstack) and adapted it for C++ development. The original is brilliant for web dev (Playwright, npm, React). I rebuilt it for the C++ toolchain. What changed: - Browser automation → cmake/make/ninja build system - Playwright QA → ctest + GTest/Catch2 - ESLint → clang-tidy/cppcheck - Browser console errors → ASan/UBSan/TSan/valgrind reports What it does: 13 specialist AI roles: - `/review` — Pre-landing PR review (memory safety, UB, data races) - `/qa` — Build → test → analyze → sanitizers → fix → re-verify - `/ship` — One-command ship with PR creation - Plus architecture planning, design audit, CEO review, etc. My additions (v0.7.0): - n8n integration for GitHub → Slack → Jira automation - MCP server wrapper for external AI agents - Pre-built workflows for common operations T