HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Genki-S
ttnt
Ruby2015–2015
Genki-S / ttnt

ttnt

Test This, Not That! (Google Summer of Code 2015 project under Ruby on Rails)

3Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
263GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Test This, Not That! (Google Summer of Code 2015 project under Ruby on Rails)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-08-07 23:54:30 UTC to 2015-10-02 13:53:24 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

01232015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 32015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 312015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 commentsSep 28

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 32015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 102015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 172015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 242015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 312015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 72015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 142015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 212015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 282015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC321

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Well, it is kind-of possible for Ruby/Rails. I half-built such a system once. Here's what you do: * Gather coverage information when running tests or compiling assets. * Use that to generate Rakefiles for running tests / compiling assets that have dependencies on the source files they would touch. * Run the tests once, recording information about the git status of each dependency. * When the git status of a file changes (i.e. you've just fetched some changes), mark the dependency as dirty Even better, it you're gathering coverage data and know the test status for each commit, then not only can you show the commit that broke the build, you can show the particular part of the diff that broke the build. Here's a guy who was trying to do some of this: https://github.com/Genki-S/ttnt
In Things I would build if I worked at GitHub

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.