HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
gezilinll
Proteus
TypeScript2026–2026
gezilinll / Proteus

Proteus

The AI-native editor for multimodal creation

2Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
25GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The AI-native editor for multimodal creation

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-01-02 04:12:22 UTC to 2026-01-03 04:25:19 UTC.

0122026-01-02 04:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsJan 2, 04:002026-01-02 05:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 07:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 08:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 10:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 11:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 13:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 14:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 16:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 2, 16:002026-01-02 17:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 19:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 20:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 22:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 23:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-03 01:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-03 02:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-03 04:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 3, 04:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 2, 04:002026-01-02 04:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 05:00:00 UTC211
Jan 2, 05:002026-01-02 05:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 06:002026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 07:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 07:002026-01-02 07:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 08:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 08:002026-01-02 08:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 09:002026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 10:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 10:002026-01-02 10:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 11:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 11:002026-01-02 11:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 12:002026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 13:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 13:002026-01-02 13:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 14:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 14:002026-01-02 14:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 15:002026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 16:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 16:002026-01-02 16:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 17:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 17:002026-01-02 17:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 18:002026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 19:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 19:002026-01-02 19:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 20:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 20:002026-01-02 20:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 21:002026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 22:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 22:002026-01-02 22:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 23:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 23:002026-01-02 23:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 3, 00:002026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 01:00:00 UTC000
Jan 3, 01:002026-01-03 01:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 02:00:00 UTC000
Jan 3, 02:002026-01-03 02:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC000
Jan 3, 03:002026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 04:00:00 UTC211
Jan 3, 04:002026-01-03 04:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 05:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
I'm building Proteus, an open-source multimodal editor (think Figma meets Notion, but AI-native) where *AI writes most of the code* while I focus on architecture, technical decisions, and quality control. *Why this matters:* In 2025, tools like Cursor and Claude can write good enough code in 80% of scenarios. The question isn't "Can AI code?" but "What becomes valuable when AI can code?" I believe it's *system design, technical decision-making, and end-to-end ownership*—not just knowing APIs. *What makes this different:* - *AI-native from day one*: Every architectural decision prioritizes AI-friendliness. This isn't AI bolted on later—it's designed for AI collaboration from the first line. - *Fully transparent*: All code, architecture decisions, and lessons learned are public. I'm documenting the entire journey in weekly technical article
Read the rest
s. - *Real editor, not a toy*: Phase 1 is complete with a working demo. You can create shapes, text, images, transform them, copy/paste, undo/redo—all the core editor capabilities. - *Learning resource*: If you want to understand how editors work (scene graphs, rendering, interaction systems) or how to structure code for AI collaboration, this is a live case study. *Current status:* Phase 1: Core editing (scene graph, rendering, interaction, tools) Phase 2: Multimodal elements (video, audio, web embeds) Phase 3: AI Agent integration (natural language → editor actions) Phase 4: Real-time collaboration *Try it:* [Live Demo](https://proteus.gezilinll.com/) *Code:* [GitHub](https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus) *Articles:* [Tech Blog](https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus/tree/main/articles) (4 articles so far, covering architecture, rendering, interaction design) *The experiment:* What happens when you stop reviewing AI's code and instead focus entirely on architecture, problem diagnosis, and guiding AI through testing and context-building? That's what I'm exploring here. Would love feedback from the HN community—especially from those building complex frontend apps or thinking about AI-native development workflows. --- ## Alternative Shorter Version (if character limit is an issue) *Title:* Proteus: An AI-native multimodal editor where AI writes 80% of the code *Description:* Building an open-source editor (Figma + Notion, AI-native) where AI writes most code while I focus on architecture and decisions. *Why:* In 2025, AI can code—so what becomes valuable? System design, technical decisions, and ownership. *What's different:* - AI-native from day one (not bolted on) - Fully transparent (all code + articles public) - Real editor (Phase 1 complete, working demo) - Learning resource (how editors work, AI-native architecture) *Status:* Phase 1 | Phase 2-4 *Demo:* https://proteus.gezilinll.com/ *Code:* https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus *Articles:* https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus/tree/main/articles Experimenting with: What happens when you stop reviewing AI code and focus on architecture + problem diagnosis?
In Proteus: The AI-native editor for multimodal creation Topics
I'm building Proteus, an open-source multimodal editor (think Figma meets Notion, but AI-native) where *AI writes most of the code* while I focus on architecture, technical decisions, and quality control. *Why this matters:* In 2025, tools like Cursor and Claude can write good enough code in 80% of scenarios. The question isn't "Can AI code?" but "What becomes valuable when AI can code?" I believe it's *system design, technical decision-making, and end-to-end ownership*—not just knowing APIs. *What makes this different:* - *AI-native from day one*: Every architectural decision prioritizes AI-friendliness. This isn't AI bolted on later—it's designed for AI collaboration from the first line. - *Fully transparent*: All code, architecture decisions, and lessons learned are public. I'm documenting the entire journey in weekly technical article
Read the rest
s. - *Real editor, not a toy*: Phase 1 is complete with a working demo. You can create shapes, text, images, transform them, copy/paste, undo/redo—all the core editor capabilities. - *Learning resource*: If you want to understand how editors work (scene graphs, rendering, interaction systems) or how to structure code for AI collaboration, this is a live case study. *Current status:* Phase 1: Core editing (scene graph, rendering, interaction, tools) Phase 2: Multimodal elements (video, audio, web embeds) Phase 3: AI Agent integration (natural language → editor actions) Phase 4: Real-time collaboration *Try it:* [Live Demo](https://proteus.gezilinll.com/) *Code:* [GitHub](https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus) *Articles:* [Tech Blog](https://github.com/gezilinll/Proteus/tree/main/articles) (4 articles so far, covering architecture, rendering, interaction design) *The experiment:* What happens when you stop reviewing AI's code and instead focus entirely on architecture, problem diagnosis, and guiding AI through testing and context-building? That's what I'm exploring here. Would love feedback from the HN community—especially from those building complex frontend apps or thinking about AI-native development workflows.
In Proteus: The AI-native editor for multimodal creation

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.