cloud-storage-comparison

The only reason I use other storage provider than backblaze is simply because of the benchmark done by one of the more modern backup tool author. https://github.com/gilbertchen/cloud-storage-comparison/blob... Can anyone from backblaze say anything about their performance compared to other vendors? The pricing is certainly ahead of others, so I would use if the performance is comparable to some of the leading group tested there.

There's also Duplicacy which I feel is a bit more mature than restic (I felt it more performing and it also has a web interface but the lack of mount capability that restic has is what I miss and retention policy is quite easier to specify for restic too), though it's a paid software for non personal usage. But paid is good that the author has less reason to move away from it. (As mentioned elsewhere, restic hasn't been updated in a while but they recently changed their pricing to be much more agressive which I hated. I wish they give it a softer pricing model than cost per machine.) https://duplicacy.com/ Their comparison of cloud storage providers gave me a good insight on what to choose in terms of performance. https://github.com/gilbertchen/cloud-storage-comparison/ I use both restic and Duplicacy, so my backups are done by multiple i

duplicacy is another alternative. It has paid plans but free for personal CLI usage. Their study on various cloud storage performance helped me decide tremendously. https://github.com/gilbertchen/cloud-storage-comparison I make backups using multiple implementations (restic and duplicacy) to avoid unfortunate case of an implementation corrupting encrypted / compressed data which may become unrecoverable completely or any other bug to partially corrupt it. I hate it when backups don't work when I need it and it's not easy to do 100% verification on all backups regularly.