HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
gitsense
gsc-cli
Go2026–2026
gitsense / gsc-cli

gsc-cli

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
11GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-06-08 19:30:39 UTC to 2026-09-17 18:50:33 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0123452026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 commentsJun 82026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 272026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 14

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 82026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC505
Jun 152026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 222026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 292026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 62026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 132026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 202026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 272026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 32026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 102026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 172026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 242026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 312026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 72026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 142026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-21 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

8 sources
Unfortunately I won't be able to use the npm as I need it for synching which is managed by https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli/tree/staging The only thing that seems to be missing is synching but I have a workaround for that but it won't be near realtime. For example, Pi changes are usually a second or less behind the Pi session log. With txcript, it will probably be 5 seconds which is fine since the use case will mostly revolve around discovery, organizing and inspection.
In Launch HN: Skillsync (YC W26) – AI chat sessions made portable across agents
The code in http://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli contains over 300 go files and I would say 90% were one shots. I can even prove that they are AI generated since I attribute the AI in each file, as shown in the example below: https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli/blob/main/internal/cli/r... Since I don't know go, I can't say which is the best. I am also sure they would not live up to a go experts expectations. I just know that since I don't know go, I would not have been able to create the tool. I can also prove that you can easily maintain AI generated code since I have been expanding and evolving it for over 6 months with pretty much no issues.
In Is AI ruining our skills? Early results are in – and they're not good
I am working on solving the AI Code Provenance problem and I believe my repos may be the first that provides AI code provenance. See the following example: https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli/blob/main/internal/cli/r... Notice how the code block header attributes the model. The UUID can be traced to the conversation so everybody can tell exactly how the code came about. For this to work though, you need to use my chat app as it ensures you can't tamper with things if you are truly serious about AI code provenance. I also have a lot more human-focused method which is part of my CLI tool. https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli I am currently looking at making pi (https://github.com/earendil-works/pi) support AI code provenance, but for now if you want a more structured way to capture what you have done in an agent session that can be used in c
Read the rest
ode reviews and be carried forward as knowledge that lives inside your repository, I have gsc lessons The basic idea is, after you have finished chatting/working with the agent, you would work with it to identify lessons worth carrying forward. You can store your session if you want, but really, the lessons should be something that can help you review code better and to prevent future mistakes. I have a real working example at https://github.com/gitsense/smart-ripgrep This is a fork of the BurntSushi/ripgrep repository. It shows how you can use lessons to learn from past design decisions.
In AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less
I created this and I would say glm-4.7 accounts for 80% of the code in https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli If you look at a file like: https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli/blob/main/internal/cli/r... you can see that I attribute the models used. What I found was 4.7 was not very good at `go` code which was why you started to see `Gemini 3 Flash` in the attributions. 4.7 is what Cerebras provide and for me, speed in iterations is a lot more important. Having played around with MiMo v2.5.0-Pro, I am 100% sure it could have done what Gemini 3 Flash did. There were a few points where I was stuck and needed Sonnet to explain things to me, but I think the dirty secret that Anthropic and OpenAI won't tell you is, if you know how to code, the models are honestly good enough. Based on my experience with MiMo and what others are saying about GLM 5.
Read the rest
1, we are now in a hardware race. The Chinese Models are 100% drop in replacement for Claude if you know how to program but want to AI to help amplify what you know. What I will consider now is what provider can provide the fastest inference. MiMo-v2.5.0-Pro-Ultraspeed is really good at generating good results quickly and burning your money as fast.
In Kimi K2.7-Code: open-source coding model with better token efficiency
This sounds like it is more aligned with what I have created which is "We need to capture your conversations with AI". If you look at https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli/blob/main/internal/cli/r... you can see that every file has a code block header with a UUID and the AI that was attributed to it. With the UUID, I can tell exactly how the code came about. What they are working on will be more useful for AI code provenance. It is only a matter of time before you are expected to show your chats with AI as part of the code review and for performance reviews. So I don't see human collaboration being the main use case. I see tracking, studying and improving the Human-AI relationship...and seeing if somebody should be promoted or not. An interesting take I've heard is, we will have a token/impact stat where if you spent a shitload of tokens to
Read the rest
produce the same impact as somebody else who spent a lot less, you will be the prime candidate for layoffs and/or less pay. This is why I think AI code provenance will become a serious thing in the future.
In Software is made between commits
My CLI does something close to this: https://github.com/gitsense/gsc-cli `gsc grep` is just an alias for `gsc rg`, mostly because agents are much more likely to reach for “grep” than “rg”. It works pretty well, but it is not a perfect drop-in replacement. `grep` and `ripgrep` differ in a few details, especially around glob/wildcard behaviour and flags. What I found works is to not use `grep` in search examples, and have the CLI spit out an error message for the AI saying this is `ripgrep`, so it needs to use `ripgrep` syntax.
In Is Grep All You Need? How Agent Harnesses Reshape Agentic Search

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.