HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
gmarty
grunt-closure-compiler
JavaScript2013–2016
gmarty / grunt-closure-compiler

grunt-closure-compiler

A Grunt task for Closure Compiler

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
179GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A Grunt task for Closure Compiler

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-09-02 20:57:38 UTC to 2016-06-06 09:06:18 UTC.

012013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I think the biggest loser in this comparison is Closure Compiler, which is around for years with all those features. It's also still active with development on understanding and transpiling ES6 and even TypeScript from what I've heard [1]. There also made a good move recently, enabling ES6 modules packages instead of its own goog.provide/goog.require. Yet, the available toolchain for it is years behind others. If you wonder how you should have any live reload development with it, you can either rely on community plugins like grunt-closure-compiler [2] or hope plovr[3] is finally resurrected back to a state where it's usable. This all sounds fine until you think about any unit testing. The only karma runner[4] for closure is simply broken and unmaintained. Even worse, most of npm packages you might want to compile with your code will outpu
Read the rest
t thousands of errors because there is no clear way to whitelist code as "not my code leave it alone". I can just hope one day Google will publish a yeoman generator with all those things solved and get it back in the game. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/closure-compiler-discu... [2] https://github.com/gmarty/grunt-closure-compiler [3] https://github.com/bolinfest/plovr [4] https://github.com/karma-runner/karma-closure
In Flow vs. Typescript

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.