HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
gnobitab
InstaFlow
Python2023–2023
gnobitab / InstaFlow

InstaFlow

:zap: InstaFlow! One-Step Stable Diffusion with Rectified Flow (ICLR 2024)

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

:zap: InstaFlow! One-Step Stable Diffusion with Rectified Flow (ICLR 2024)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-09-14 02:48:27 UTC to 2023-09-18 22:47:59 UTC.

012023-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-14 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 14, 00:002023-09-14 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-15 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-15 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-15 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-15 12:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-15 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-15 18:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-16 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-16 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-16 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 16, 06:002023-09-16 12:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-16 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-16 18:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-17 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-17 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-17 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-17 12:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-17 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-17 18:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 06:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 12:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-18 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-18 18:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 18, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 14, 00:002023-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-14 06:00:00 UTC101
Sep 14, 06:002023-09-14 06:00:00 UTC2023-09-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 12:002023-09-14 12:00:00 UTC2023-09-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 14, 18:002023-09-14 18:00:00 UTC2023-09-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 00:002023-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-15 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 06:002023-09-15 06:00:00 UTC2023-09-15 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 12:002023-09-15 12:00:00 UTC2023-09-15 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 15, 18:002023-09-15 18:00:00 UTC2023-09-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 16, 00:002023-09-16 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-16 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 16, 06:002023-09-16 06:00:00 UTC2023-09-16 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 16, 12:002023-09-16 12:00:00 UTC2023-09-16 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 16, 18:002023-09-16 18:00:00 UTC2023-09-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 17, 00:002023-09-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-17 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 17, 06:002023-09-17 06:00:00 UTC2023-09-17 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 17, 12:002023-09-17 12:00:00 UTC2023-09-17 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 17, 18:002023-09-17 18:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 18, 00:002023-09-18 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 18, 06:002023-09-18 06:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 18, 12:002023-09-18 12:00:00 UTC2023-09-18 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 18, 18:002023-09-18 18:00:00 UTC2023-09-19 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Basically Stable Diffusion can be trained to only require one inference step for image generation rather than tens of steps. Abstract: Diffusion models have revolutionized text-to-image generation with its exceptional quality and creativity. However, its multi-step sampling process is known to be slow, often requiring tens of inference steps to obtain satisfactory results. Previous attempts to improve its sampling speed and reduce computational costs through distillation have been unsuccessful in achieving a functional one-step model. In this paper, we explore a recent method called Rectified Flow, which, thus far, has only been applied to small datasets. The core of Rectified Flow lies in its \emph{reflow} procedure, which straightens the trajectories of probability flows, refines the coupling between noises and images, and facilitates t
Read the rest
he distillation process with student models. We propose a novel text-conditioned pipeline to turn Stable Diffusion (SD) into an ultra-fast one-step model, in which we find reflow plays a critical role in improving the assignment between noise and images. Leveraging our new pipeline, we create, to the best of our knowledge, the first one-step diffusion-based text-to-image generator with SD-level image quality, achieving an FID (Frechet Inception Distance) of 23.3 on MS COCO 2017-5k, surpassing the previous state-of-the-art technique, progressive distillation, by a significant margin (37.2 → 23.3 in FID). By utilizing an expanded network with 1.7B parameters, we further improve the FID to 22.4. We call our one-step models \emph{InstaFlow}. On MS COCO 2014-30k, InstaFlow yields an FID of 13.1 in just 0.09 second, the best in ≤0.1 second regime, outperforming the recent StyleGAN-T (13.9 in 0.1 second). Notably, the training of InstaFlow only costs 199 A100 GPU days. Project page: https://github.com/gnobitab/InstaFlow
In InstaFlow: Step Good for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generation

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.