HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
google
containerregistry
Python2018–2018
google / containerregistry · Archived

containerregistry

A set of Python libraries and tools for interacting with a Docker Registry.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
212GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A set of Python libraries and tools for interacting with a Docker Registry.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-03-06 13:46:36 UTC to 2018-04-16 21:01:00 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 52018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 262018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 16

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 52018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 122018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 192018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 262018-03-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 22018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 92018-04-09 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 162018-04-16 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-23 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
- We've published libraries to interact with the registry without docker or the docker CLI, which we use in these projects https://github.com/google/go-containerregistry https://github.com/google/containerregistry - Our team has built something exactly like you're describing https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/distroless Dockerfiles without RUN commands are technically more correct: reproducible, much easier to inspect. However, its quite limiting for the existing corpus of Dockerfiles. I like to think of kaniko as the (pull) + build + push decoupling of the docker monolith. Other tools, like cri-o, have implemented the complement (pull + run). Disclaimer: I work on kaniko and some of these other tools at Google
In Kaniko: Build container images in Kubernetes
It eschews docker, and Dockerfiles and their non-determinism, and builds the layers itself, and uses a python lib [1] to push and pull container images. In order to ensure reproducibility/determinism, however, Bazel doesn't have an equivalent of the RUN instruction. You have to use other Bazel rules to fetch and produce artefacts and add them to an image, and there aren't always rules for what it is you want to do (I have a spot of bother with installing pip packages, for which there is apparently alpha support). This is, I think, the thing with Bazel: it has to re-invent everything to ensure this reproducibility and hermetic seal, because it doesn't trust existing build tools to do this, and quite rightly so if this is what you're seeking. But I suspect it's going to be painful doing things outside the mainstream supported stuff. [1] htt
Read the rest
In Bazel Fawlty

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.