paranoid_crypto

What about if you then feed that into a DRBG? TRNG based on quantum vacuum: From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44371059 : > "100-Gbit/s Integrated Quantum Random Number Generator Based on Vacuum Fluctuations" https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010330 From .. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43497414 : >>> google/paranoid_crypto.lib.randomness_tests There are NIST randomness tests, for example; https://github.com/google/paranoid_crypto/tree/main/paranoid... https://github.com/google/paranoid_crypto/blob/main/examples... "Traceable random numbers from a non-local quantum advantage" (2025) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09054-3 : > Here we demonstrate a fully traceable random number generation protocol based on device-independent techniques. Our protocol extracts randomness from unpredictable non-local quant

Another source of random entropy better than a wall of lava lamps: >> "100-Gbit/s Integrated Quantum Random Number Generator Based on Vacuum Fluctuations" https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010330 But is that good enough random for rngd to continually re-seed an rng with? (Is our description of such measurable fluctuations in the quantum foam inadequate to predict what we're calling random?) > google/paranoid_crypto.lib.randomness_tests: https://github.com/google/paranoid_crypto/tree/main/paranoid... .. docs: https://github.com/google/paranoid_crypto/blob/main/docs/ran...