HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
google
styleguide
Emacs Lisp2015–2025
google / styleguide

styleguide

Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects

20Distinct people
20Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
39.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Style guides for Google-originated open-source projects

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year20 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-09-23 13:52:07 UTC to 2025-05-17 03:50:14 UTC.

0123452015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

20 sources
It's memory safe, but it's not necessarily free of race conditions! It's not only C extensions that release the GIL, the Python interpreter itself releases the GIL after a certain number of instructions so that other threads can make progress. See https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.getswitchinte.... Certain operations that look atomic to the user are actually comprised of multiple bytecode instructions. Now, if you are unlucky, the interpreter decides to release the GIL and yield to another thread exactly during such instructions. You won't get a segfault, but you might get unexpected results. See also https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/91d6e367e384b0d8aa...
In The first year of free-threaded Python
Since it's been around since 2003, I'm curious to know how many projects out there are using it. Would be great if there are some open source examples available as well. I mostly stick to Python, so I'm most familiar with the Google docstring format[1], but seeing as there are other ones[2] as well aren't those usable for other languages too? Seems to be the case of yet another "standard", though since this is such an old project I may out of my depth in saying that. --- [1]: https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m... [2]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/24385103
In NaturalDocs: Plain English code documentation
I don't see how anyone could have a hard time using lambdas... they've been around forever, and most programming languages nowadays have them. A good rule of thumb is given by the google python coding guidelines [1]: "Okay to use them for one-liners. If the code inside the lambda function is any longer than 60-80 chars, it's probably better to define it as a regular (nested) function." [1] https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m...
In Stop writing lambda expressions in Python
The only recommendation for users is "you should avoid reusing the same password across multiple different sites. A password manager like 1Password or LastPass can help with this." Seriously? No help to tell me if I have been affected? If someone here knows a JS linter that does not require npm/yarn, even ten times less powerful than eslint, please share. It's astonishing that linting C++ requires one file, https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/cpplint/c..., but linting JS requires MBs of dependencies.
In Postmortem for Malicious Packages Published on July 12th, 2018

Showing the 15 most recent of 20 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.