styleguide

While supported, list comprehensions that are multiple levels deep isn't considered good style. There is an example of this in Google's python style guide: https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m...

I don't see how anyone could have a hard time using lambdas... they've been around forever, and most programming languages nowadays have them. A good rule of thumb is given by the google python coding guidelines [1]: "Okay to use them for one-liners. If the code inside the lambda function is any longer than 60-80 chars, it's probably better to define it as a regular (nested) function." [1] https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m...

https://developers.google.com/edu/python/introduction: According to the official Python style guide (PEP 8), you should indent with 4 spaces. (Fun fact: Google's internal style guideline dictates indenting by 2 spaces!) https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m...: Indent your code blocks with 4 spaces.

Unless companywide guidelines are agreed upon, and published. E.g http://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.m...

The only recommendation for users is "you should avoid reusing the same password across multiple different sites. A password manager like 1Password or LastPass can help with this." Seriously? No help to tell me if I have been affected? If someone here knows a JS linter that does not require npm/yarn, even ten times less powerful than eslint, please share. It's astonishing that linting C++ requires one file, https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/cpplint/c..., but linting JS requires MBs of dependencies.