HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
google
trax
Python2019–2024
google / trax · Archived

trax

Trax — Deep Learning with Clear Code and Speed

7Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Trax — Deep Learning with Clear Code and Speed

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-12-08 02:33:24 UTC to 2024-04-24 09:19:02 UTC.

012342019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

8 sources
Is t5x an encoder/decoder architecture? Some more general options. The Flax ecosystem https://github.com/google/flax?tab=readme-ov-file or dm-haiku https://github.com/google-deepmind/dm-haiku were some of the best developed communities in the Jax AI field Perhaps the “trax” repo? https://github.com/google/trax Some HF examples https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/main/exampl... Sadly it seems much of the work is proprietary these days, but one example could be Grok-1, if you customize the details. https://github.com/xai-org/grok-1/blob/main/run.py
In Maxtext: A simple, performant and scalable Jax LLM
Impressive model, thank you for releasing it under a business-friendly license! Have you considered using Google's sparse "scaling transformer" architecture as the base? Even at 3B scale it can generate 3-4x more tokens per FLOP while being competitive at perplexity with a dense transformer. I think OpenAI uses a variant of it in their ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo product. Here is the paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.12763 and the implementation https://github.com/google/trax/blob/master/trax/models/resea... if you are interested. Hope you get to look into this!
In Replit's new Code LLM: Open Source, 77% smaller than Codex, trained in 1 week
Thank you for developing the pipeline and amassing considerable compute for gathering and preprocessing this dataset! I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask about this, but could you consider training an LLM using a more advanced, sparse transformer architecture (specifically, "Terraformer" from this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.12763 and this codebase https://github.com/google/trax/blob/master/trax/models/resea... by Google Brain and OpenAI)? I understand the pressure to focus on training a straightforward LLaMA replication, but of course you see that it's a legacy dense architecture which limits its inference performance. This new architecture is not just an academic curiosity but is already validated at scale by Google, providing 10x+ inference performance boost on the same hardware. Frankly, the community's compute budget
Read the rest
- for training and for inference - isn't infinite, and neither is the public's interest in models that do not have advantage (at least in convenience) over closed-source ones; and so we should utilize both those resources as efficiently as possible. It could be a big step forward if you trained at least LLaMA-Terraformer-7B and 13B foundation models on the whole dataset.
In RedPajama: Reproduction of LLaMA with friendly license

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.